- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 11:24:04 -0500
- To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <m2iqpipy6z.fsf@nwalsh.com>
> The XML Core WG met by phone on Wednesday, December 17 for one hour. Present: Norm (chairing and scribe), John, Glenn, Richard Regrets: Paul > Agenda > ====== > 1. Accepting the minutes from the last telcon [3] and > the current task status [2] (have any questions, comments, > or corrections ready by the beginning of the call). Accepted. > 2. Miscellaneous administrivia and document reviews. None. > 3. XML 1.0 > > See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-errata > > The XML 1.0 5th Edition Recommendation is at > http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-20081126/ No action required. > 4. XML Test Suite. > > See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-test-suite > > ACTION to Richard: Construct a test case for the XML test suite > issues raised by Frans Englich: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-testsuite/2007Mar/ Continued. > 5. Namespaces in XML 1.0/1.1 > > See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.0 and > http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.1. > > The NS 1.0 2nd Ed Errata document is at > http://www.w3.org/XML/2006/xml-names-errata > > The NS PE doc is at > http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2001/05/proposed-xml-names-errata.html > > Richard added some discussion at > http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2001/05/proposed-xml-names-errata.html#npe29 > The WG agreed with his direction and asked that he go forward with it. > > ACTION to Richard: Fill in a proposed resolution for NPE29. Continued. > 6. LEIRIs > > See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#leiri > > The WG Note defining LEIRIs is at > http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/NOTE-leiri-20081103/ > > The following specs need to be revised to reference LEIRIs: > XML 1.0 6th Edition > XML 1.1 3rd Edition > XML Base 2nd Edition > XLink 1.1 (First Edition) > XInclude 3rd Edition ACTION: Norm to update the XLink 1.1 to refer to the LEIRI note. > 7. XML Base 2nd Edition 2nd PER > > See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-base > > The (second) XML Base (Second Edition) PER has been published at > http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/PER-xmlbase-20080320/ > and announced at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2008JanMar/0112 > > The XML Base PER review period ended 30 June 2008. > > Richard developed a DoC document for XML Base at > http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2008/09/xmlbase-2e/disposition.html > > The lastest draft of the spec is at > http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2006/09/xmlbase-2e/ > > ACTION to Richard: Make a boilerplate pass on the draft and > then work with Paul and Henry to finalize it. Richard: I've been editing the boilerplate and it probably passes pubrules now. Time for Henry to move it forward. Richard: I also had an action to check on the patent policy question. Earlier today, I posted some mail with a note from Ian about what we should do about that. And I've done that. > ACTION to Henry: Take XML Base 2nd Ed to Rec. Henry: I've got a little bit of concern about the DoC; I don't think it's completely up-to-date. Some of the comments say "we will". Richard: Yes, and I have. Henry/Richard review the DoC. Henry: I've started drafting the transition, but the moratorium starts tomorrow so this won't happen until January. > 8. XLink 1.1. > > See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xlink1.1 > > The earlier XLink CR was published at > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/CR-xlink11-20060328/ > > The XLink 1.1 LC was published at > http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-xlink11-20080331/ > > The LC review period ended 16 May 2008. > > Norm has prepared a DoC at > http://www.w3.org/XML/2008/05/xlinklc/ > > ACTION to Henry: Continue to get the XSD for > XLink at an accessible URI. Completed. > There's an open question about whether the XSD/DTD > should default the xlink:type attribute value. > None of this effects our last call because the > XSD/DTD are not normative. > > John asked whether we should have two schemas, one for > each of our conformance levels. > > ACTION to Henry, John: Think about having a basic level > conformance XSD for XLink. Continued. John: The notion was to have a schema for people who want to implement the basic level of conformance, so they only have simple links. John: For the DTD, which is just a sample, we just need a smaller subset. Likewise, the XSD should include only declarations for the simple links. > Paul asks us to consider skipping CR and going directly to PR. > > ACTION to Henry: Review the history and make a recommendation > as to whether we should skip CR and go directly to PR. Continued. > 9. XInclude 3rd Edition > > See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xinclude > > XInclude 2nd Edition is at: > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xinclude-20061115 > > See http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xinclude for > LEIRI-related changes for the 3rd Edition. > > ACTION to Daniel: Produce a PER-ready draft of XInclude 3rd Ed > with appropriate references to the IRI RFC for LEIRIs. Continued. 10. Any other business? None heard. Happy holidays and Joyeux Noel! Our next meeting is on 14 Jan 2009. > [1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core > [2] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#tasks > [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2008Dec/0001 Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | On the other hand, you have different http://nwalsh.com/ | fingers.
Received on Wednesday, 17 December 2008 16:24:49 UTC