- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 10:54:14 -0500
- To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xml-core-wg- > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Grosso, Paul > Sent: Friday, 2009 December 04 9:24 > To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > Subject: Draft PER of Associating Style Sheets with XML documents 1.0 > (Second Edition) available for review > Associating Style Sheets with XML documents 1.0 (Second Edition) > http://www.w3.org/XML/2009/12/xml-stylesheet/ Now that we have made public our draft PER for AssocSS 2nd Ed--in which we have described rules for parsing pseudo-attributes from a string--it's time to decide how we will handle SC 34/WG1's request to be able to use xml-model for a PI target. It has been reported that there would be problems with JTC1 writing the spec and then having W3C publish it. One solution would be for us to write the spec as a WG Note and then ISO can reference it or otherwise incorporate it as they wish. Henry reports that IJ would be happy to see the WG produce a Note. Paul wants to draft the Note first as a starting point from which ISO can write their spec--in coordination with us and as we redraft our Note to keep it in sync--and then when they have a final spec, we will finalize our Note with a reference to the ISO spec. Does anyone in the WG (especially the staff contact) have any problems with such a plan? Unless there are major concerns, I'd like to have a WG decision to do this by the end of next week's telcon. Do we have any volunteers to draft such a Note? paul
Received on Monday, 7 December 2009 15:55:34 UTC