- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 10:54:18 -0500
- To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
The XML Core WG telcons are every other week. Our next telcon will be December 16. To make this report more manageable, I have deleted several topics on which the status has not changed in the last couple months and on which I don't expect the status to change soon. These topics remain in our agenda/minutes. Status and open actions ======================= SC 34/WG 1 use of xml-model PI ------------------------------ SC 34/WG1 requested to be able to use xml-model for a PI target. It has been reported that there would be problems with JTC1 writing the spec and then having W3C publish it. One solution would be for us to write the spec (WG Note or Rec?) and then ISO would reference it. Henry reports that IJ would be happy to see the WG produce a Note. Paul wants the WG Note to be the complete spec so that someone can reference it. Paul wants to draft the note first as a starting point from which ISO can write their spec--in coordination with us and as we redraft our Note to keep it in sync--and then when they have a final spec, we will finalize our Note with a reference to the ISO spec. **** Now that our first draft of AssocSS is published, I'd like to have a WG decision as to whether we will produce a draft WG Note for xml-model or, if not, how we plan to proceed here. **** 3023-bis -------- A new proposed draft is at http://www.w3.org/2006/02/son-of-3023/latest.html Paul sent comments on this latest draft at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Nov/0054 They were mostly editorial, but Paul did request the addition of a para: Because applications are not required to support schemes other than the 'element' scheme, use of other schemes can reduce universal interoperability; such use SHOULD be carefully considered in each case. Henry is okay with that addition. Paul sent email to Chris at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Nov/0121 to request confirmation that Chris has seen these comments and plans to incorporate them. No response to date after several attempts. ACTION to Henry: Try to contact Chris to extract a response to Paul's email. Namespaces in XML 1.0/1.1 ------------------------- See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.0 and http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.1. We had a successful PER telcon on December 4, and we expect publication of NS 1.0 3rd Ed as a Rec any day now. XLink 1.1 --------- See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xlink1.1 See last meetings minutes at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Dec/0003 for a full list of ACTIONs to Norm. Associating Stylesheets ----------------------- See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#assoc-ss We are working toward a PER for AssocSS 2nd Edition. We have made our latest editor's draft at http://www.w3.org/XML/2009/12/xml-stylesheet/ publicly available for review and announced it in various fora. ACTION to Henry: Post URLs to the announcements in xml-dev and comp.text.xml.
Received on Monday, 7 December 2009 15:55:06 UTC