- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 09:45:57 -0400
- To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
Thanks, Norm. How does http://www.w3.org/XML/2006/03/xlink11-tests fit in? Should it be mentioned in this IR? Do we have a diff between the Xlink 1.0 spec and our latest Xlink 1.1 draft? (The only one I can find only diffs between the 1.1 CR and 1.1 PR-ready.) I note there is no appendix in our PR-ready draft describing the changes between 1.0 and 1.1. There probably should be. paul > -----Original Message----- > From: public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xml-core-wg- > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Norman Walsh > Sent: Wednesday, 2009 August 26 8:26 > To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > Subject: XLink 1.1 implementation report > > Stil pretty incomplete, but maybe it's a start... > > http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/xmlcore/xlink11/ir.html
Received on Wednesday, 26 August 2009 13:47:09 UTC