- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:44:36 -0400
- To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
The XML Core WG telcons are every other week. Our next telcon will be April 22. Status and open actions ======================= Unicode normalization in XML 1.0 -------------------------------- Addison Phillips of I18N sent email about Unicode Normalization in XML 1.0 5th Ed.; see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Feb/0019 Paul provided a status update to Addison and I18N at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Mar/0005 We decided to add a note; Paul sent draft wording at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Apr/0019 HTML request for clearer XML serialization ------------------------------------------ Henry raised the issue that HTML folks think the XML spec is broken because it doesn't define error recovery and doesn't discuss serialization. ACTION to Henry: Send email to the XML Core WG list outlining the suggestion to define a serialization spec including the rationale. Overlap between Powder and LEIRIs --------------------------------- At http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Mar/0006 Henry writes: Please review section 2.1.3 of the forthcoming draft of Protocol for Web Description Resources (POWDER): Grouping of Resources [1]: It says things about e.g. entity expansion which I think at risk of confusing proper layering, and it also doesn't seem to recognise the LEIRI spec. This spec just went back to Last Call. John reviewed especially section 2.1.3 of the POWDER spec at http://www.w3.org/2007/powder/Group/powder-grouping/20090309.html#canon and only had an issue with spaces and + signs; see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Apr/0013 Per Thomas Roessler at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Apr/0018 the WG may have already dealt with this issue. Pointer Methods in RDF ---------------------- The ERT WG has issued a FPWD entitled "Pointer Methods in RDF": http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-Pointers-in-RDF-20090310/ This seems to overlap with XPointer (or it should). Norm reviewed this for the XML Core WG at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Mar/0014 and there has been some follow up email discussion. Paul sent in the XML Core WG comment at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Apr/0020 ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34 request to use "xml-model" as a PI target ------------------------------------------------------------- ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34 has requested at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Apr/0001 that they be allowed to use "xml-model" as a processing instruction target name token. John thinks we should approve this. Henry worries that people will then expect that this is something from W3C, but he will not stand in the way. We should consider adding entries for xml-stylesheet and xml-model to the xml namespace document at http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace. [I don't have a decision or action listed here.] XML Test Suite -------------- See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-test-suite Henry/Richard discussed the test suite issues raised by Frans Englich: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-testsuite/2007Mar/ ACTION: Richard to construct a test case for these issues. Namespaces in XML 1.0/1.1 ------------------------- See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.0 and http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.1. The NS PE doc is at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2001/05/proposed-xml-names-errata.html Richard added some discussion at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2001/05/proposed-xml-names-errata.html#npe29 The WG agreed with his direction and asked that he go forward with it. ACTION to Richard: Fill in a proposed resolution for NPE29. Henry will work with Richard on NPE29. We will then plan to issue NS 1.0 3rd Ed. Whether we put ns prefix undeclaration into NS 1.0 3rd Ed remains an open issue. xml:id ------ The xml:id Recommendation is at http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/REC-xml-id-20050909/ John Cowan submitted a proposed erratum at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Jan/0009 Consensus: The sentence "A document that uses xml:id attributes that have a declared type other than xs:ID will always generate xml:id errors" in Appendix D.3 should be deleted. ACTION to Henry: Update the Errata document at http://www.w3.org/2005/09/xml-id-errata ACTION to Henry: Think about the appropriateness of the same sentence in Appendix D.2. XLink 1.1 --------- See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xlink1.1 The XLink 1.1 Last Call has been published at http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-xlink11-20080331/ The LC review period ended 16 May 2008. Norm has prepared a DoC at http://www.w3.org/XML/2008/05/xlinklc/ ACTION to Norm: Update the DoC. ACTION to Norm: Update XLink 1.1 to refer to the LEIRI note. There's an open question about whether the XSD/DTD should default the xlink:type attribute value. None of this effects our last call because the XSD/DTD are not normative. ACTION to Henry, John: Produce a basic level conformance XSD and RelaxNG schema for XLink. We plan to skip CR and going directly to PR. Paul drafted a PR transition request at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Mar/0013 The Implementation Report at http://www.w3.org/XML/2006/01/xlink11-implementation is pitiful. We'll need to augment this to be able to request PR. Simon Cox, on behalf of the Open Geospatial Consortium, has asked some questions about the XLink 1.1 XML Schema: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2009JanMar/ 0004 and ht replied: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2009JanMar/ 0005 We did not get to this topic--Paul sent email at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Apr/0011 to (try to) start more discussion. XInclude 3rd Edition PER ------------------------ See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xinclude XInclude 2nd Edition is at: http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xinclude-20061115 ACTION to Daniel: Produce a PER-ready draft of XInclude 3rd Ed with appropriate references to the IRI RFC for LEIRIs. Associating Stylesheets ----------------------- See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#assoc-ss Associating stylesheets with XML version 1.0 is at: http://www.w3.org/1999/06/REC-xml-stylesheet-19990629/ The Errata document is at: http://www.w3.org/1999/06/REC-xml-stylesheet-19990629/errata Simon has requested we consider revisions; see his email at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Feb/0002 and his suggested draft at http://simon.html5.org/specs/xml-stylesheet5 See also Simon's email at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Feb/0014 outlining various issues. Paul sent email giving Arbortext's behavior and other comments at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Feb/0022 ACTION to Henry: Determine Saxon behavior in various erroneous cases and reply to Simon's email with results and suggested resolutions. ACTION to Paul: After receiving Henry's email, send email with a concrete set of suggested revisions to the Assoc SS spec.
Received on Monday, 13 April 2009 20:47:05 UTC