W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > October 2008

Re: Progress on XML 1.0 5e disposition of comments

From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 11:57:51 -0400
To: "Grosso, Paul" <pgrosso@ptc.com>
Cc: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20081002155751.GI31839@mercury.ccil.org>

Grosso, Paul scripsit:

> I see that all the points are editorial or process except
> Issue boyer-1 which is listed as (substantive, pending):
>  Changing the Char production to Unicode 5 is a big change 
>  for content -- shouldn't we just abandon Unicode altogether?
> Should this issue be "(process, pending)"?  Or are we just
> going to reject it?

As I said before, this is a presupposition failure, as the Char
production has not changed.

What is the sound of Perl?  Is it not the       John Cowan
sound of a [Ww]all that people have stopped     cowan@ccil.org
banging their head against?  --Larry            http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Received on Thursday, 2 October 2008 15:58:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:40:37 UTC