Re: Progress on XML 1.0 5e disposition of comments

Grosso, Paul scripsit:

> I see that all the points are editorial or process except
> Issue boyer-1 which is listed as (substantive, pending):
>  Changing the Char production to Unicode 5 is a big change 
>  for content -- shouldn't we just abandon Unicode altogether?
> 
> Should this issue be "(process, pending)"?  Or are we just
> going to reject it?

As I said before, this is a presupposition failure, as the Char
production has not changed.

-- 
What is the sound of Perl?  Is it not the       John Cowan
sound of a [Ww]all that people have stopped     cowan@ccil.org
banging their head against?  --Larry            http://www.ccil.org/~cowan

Received on Thursday, 2 October 2008 15:58:28 UTC