- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 15:12:56 +0000
- To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
In my concern to address the Namespace issue, I overlooked a minor
point in James's [1] comment:
". . . the definition:
[Definition: A *Name* is a token beginning with a letter or one
of a few punctuation characters, and continuing with letters,
digits, hyphens, underscores, colons, or full stops, together
known as name characters.]
... is clearly not appropriate given the new definition of name."
Richard and I have discussed this, and agree that it is at least
inaccurate if not a bit misleading. This definition is never linked
to, but the word 'name' is used w/o a cross-reference at various
points, and of course there may be references from other specs.
We haven't come up with a trivial fix, and we _could_ just do
nothing. On balance we prefer the following editorial change:
Reorganize and change the paragraphs at the beginning of the
introduction to the _Names and Tokens_ productions as follows:
An Nmtoken (name token) is any mixture of name characters.
[Definition: A Name is an Nmtoken with a restricted set of initial
characters.]
Names beginning with the string " xml ", or with any string which
would match (('X'|'x') ('M'|'m') ('L'|'l')), are reserved for
standardization in this or future versions of this specification.
Note:
The Namespaces in XML Recommendation [XML Names] assigns a
meaning to names containing colon characters. Therefore, authors
should not use the colon in XML names except for namespace
purposes, but XML processors must accept the colon as a name
character.
What do people think?
ht
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-editor/2008OctDec/0016.html
- --
Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFJHZV4kjnJixAXWBoRAkdHAJ91tJV3duBfZm43URh6eurE/NLYsQCcD+c/
IRyVzUdTAb91x9oKis9HJ/Y=
=J8Xc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 14 November 2008 15:13:32 UTC