- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 15:12:56 +0000
- To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In my concern to address the Namespace issue, I overlooked a minor point in James's [1] comment: ". . . the definition: [Definition: A *Name* is a token beginning with a letter or one of a few punctuation characters, and continuing with letters, digits, hyphens, underscores, colons, or full stops, together known as name characters.] ... is clearly not appropriate given the new definition of name." Richard and I have discussed this, and agree that it is at least inaccurate if not a bit misleading. This definition is never linked to, but the word 'name' is used w/o a cross-reference at various points, and of course there may be references from other specs. We haven't come up with a trivial fix, and we _could_ just do nothing. On balance we prefer the following editorial change: Reorganize and change the paragraphs at the beginning of the introduction to the _Names and Tokens_ productions as follows: An Nmtoken (name token) is any mixture of name characters. [Definition: A Name is an Nmtoken with a restricted set of initial characters.] Names beginning with the string " xml ", or with any string which would match (('X'|'x') ('M'|'m') ('L'|'l')), are reserved for standardization in this or future versions of this specification. Note: The Namespaces in XML Recommendation [XML Names] assigns a meaning to names containing colon characters. Therefore, authors should not use the colon in XML names except for namespace purposes, but XML processors must accept the colon as a name character. What do people think? ht [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-editor/2008OctDec/0016.html - -- Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh Half-time member of W3C Team 10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFJHZV4kjnJixAXWBoRAkdHAJ91tJV3duBfZm43URh6eurE/NLYsQCcD+c/ IRyVzUdTAb91x9oKis9HJ/Y= =J8Xc -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 14 November 2008 15:13:32 UTC