- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 11:41:44 -0400
- To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
Attendees --------- John Glenn Paul Richard Norm Henry François Daniel [8 organizations (8 with proxies) present out of 9] Regrets ------- Absent organizations -------------------- A-SIT Regrets from Norm and Henry for May 21. > 1. Accepting the minutes from the last telcon [3] and > the current task status [2] (have any questions, comments, > or corrections ready by the beginning of the call). Accepted. > > 2. Miscellaneous administrivia and document reviews. > > October Technical Plenary > ------------------------- > The next Technical Plenary is scheduled for October in Cannes: > http://www.w3.org/2008/10/TPAC/Overview.html > We have tentatively decided to meet there. > > --- > > There was email about how to refer to "no namespace" at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2008Apr/0014 > > John replied at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2008Apr/0029 > So noted. > > 3. C14N 1.1 > > See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#c14n1.1 > > The C14N 1.1 Recommendation has been published at > http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-c14n11-20080502/ > > > 4. XML 1.0 > > See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-errata > > The XML 1.0 5th Edition PER has been published at > http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/PER-xml-20080205/ > > > 5. XML 1.1 > > See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml1.1 > > XML 1.1 2nd Edition published 2006 August 16: > > Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.1 (Second Edition) > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml11-20060816 > > > 6. XML Test Suite. > > See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-test-suite > > Henry/Richard discussed some test suite issues raised by > Frans Englich: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-testsuite/2007Mar/ > > ACTION: Richard to construct a test case for these issues. > ACTION to Richard continued. > > 7. Namespaces in XML 1.0/1.1 > > See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.0 and > http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.1. > > 2nd Editions published 2006 August 16: > > Namespaces in XML 1.0 (Second Edition) > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-names-20060816 > > Namespaces in XML 1.1 (Second Edition) > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-names11-20060816 > > Richard has recorded Anne's issue/proposed resolution at > http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2001/05/proposed-xml-names-errata#NPE27 > > ACTION to Richard: Look into Anne's (two) comments at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-names-editor/2007Oct/ > > ACTION to Richard: Look into the comments and update the PE > document with proposed resolutions. > Richard has updated the NS PE doc at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2001/05/proposed-xml-names-errata NPE28 Links to Attribute production are wrong --------------------------------------------- Richard suggests this is editorial and easily fixed. NPE27 Prohibition of xmlns:x="" in 1.0 should be a Namespace Constraint ----------------------------------------------------------------------- NPE29 Uniqueness of attributes should be a Namespace Constraint --------------------------------------------------------------- Richard notes that the spec already makes these points conformance issues even though they aren't call a constraint, so he isn't sure making them constraints is helpful, but we will continue to consider. After the call, Paul took a look. I don't have strong feelings on NPE29, since we already use the word "constraint" there. But for NPE27, Richard already agrees in email with Anne that the "may not" should become a 2119 "MUST NOT", so we should at least make that change, and I would feel better if we at least got the word "constraint" in here somehow. ACTION to Richard: Update the NPE27 with some discussion/proposed resolution that at least fixes the "may not" and perhaps includes the word "constraint". > > 8. LEIRIs > > See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#leiri > > Martin's latest IRI draft (defining LEIRIs in section 7) is at > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-duerst-iri-bis-02.txt > > Paul's summary of what comes next spec-by-spec is at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2007Dec/0045 > > ACTION to Henry: Do some pinging about the schedule of IRI bis. > ACTION to Henry continued. > > 9. XML Base 2nd Edition 2nd PER > > See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-base > > The (second) XML Base (Second Edition) PER has been published at > http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/PER-xmlbase-20080320/ > and announced at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2008JanMar/0112 > > > 10. XLink update. > > See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xlink1.1 > > The earlier XLink CR was published at > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/CR-xlink11-20060328/ > > The XLink 1.1 LC was published at > http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-xlink11-20080331/ > and announced at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2008Apr/0006 > > The LC review period ends 16 May 2008. > > We do have several comments at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2008AprJun/ > Paul sent a summary of the comments and some of his comments at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2008May/0004 Norm has prepared a summary page at http://www.w3.org/XML/2008/05/xlinklc/ Re: the XSD for XLink is in the spec but not at a known URI. We should fix that. ACTION to Henry and Norm: Figure out how to get the XSD for XLink at an accessible URI. ACTION to Henry: Compare the XSD for XLink at http://schemas.opengis.net/xlink/1.0.0/xlinks.xsd with that in the XLink spec. > > 11. XInclude 3rd Edition > > See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xinclude > > XInclude 2nd Edition is at: > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xinclude-20061115 > > See http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xinclude for > LEIRI-related changes for the 3rd Edition. > > ACTION to Daniel: Produce a PER-ready draft of XInclude 3rd Ed > with appropriate references to the IRI RFC for LEIRIs. > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core > [2] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#tasks > [3] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2008Apr/0021 >
Received on Wednesday, 7 May 2008 15:43:05 UTC