- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 14:21:45 -0400
- To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>, <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: "Tim Bray" <tbray@textuality.com>
And I just forwarded it to the NS comments list for tracking: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-names-editor/2008Mar/0000 paul > -----Original Message----- > From: public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Norman Walsh > Sent: Wednesday, 2008 March 26 12:27 > To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > Cc: Tim Bray > Subject: Namespaces erratum? > > Via Tim Bray > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: <Nicolas.Weidmann@lodh.com> > Date: Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 7:22 AM > Subject: Namespaces in XML 1.0 > > Dear Mr. Bray, > > Out of curiousity, I was reading some XML specs and saw that the use > of 'Letter' in XML 1.0 for 'Name'(s) was replaced by the errata by > 'NameStartChar'. > > In XML Namespaces 1.0 2nd edition, NCNameStartChar is however still > using 'Letter'. In the 1.1 version of those specs, it has been > replaced by 'NameStartChar'. > > Since there is currently no errata for the namespaces 1.0 specs, I > would like to know if 'Letter' has to be considered legal as 'Letter' > has been replaced by 'NameStartChar' by the XML 1.0 erratum? > > Regards, > > > Nicolas Weidmann >
Received on Wednesday, 26 March 2008 18:24:44 UTC