- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2008 13:04:08 -0400
- To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <m2zlq34vlj.fsf@nwalsh.com>
We have an XML Core WG phone call scheduled for Wednesday,
June 4, from
08:00-09:00 Pacific time aka
11:00-12:00 Eastern time aka
15:00-16:00 UTC
16:00-17:00 in Ireland and the UK
17:00-18:00 in middle (most of) Europe
on the Zakim W3C Bridge, +1 617 761 6200, passcode 9652#.
We also use IRC channel #xmlcore on irc.w3.org:6665 .
See the XML Core group page [1] for pointers to current documents
and other information. If you have additions to the agenda, please
email them to the WG list before the start of the telcon.
Please also review our group page's task list [2] for accuracy and
completeness and be prepared to amend if necessary and accept it
at the beginning of the call.
Agenda
======
1. Accepting the minutes from the last telcon [3] and
the current task status [2] (have any questions, comments,
or corrections ready by the beginning of the call).
2. Miscellaneous administrivia and document reviews.
October Technical Plenary
-------------------------
The next Technical Plenary is scheduled for October in Cannes:
http://www.w3.org/2008/10/TPAC/Overview.html
We have tentatively decided to meet there.
---
There is a last call for:
CURIE Syntax 1.0
A syntax for expressing Compact URIs
http://www.w3.org/TR/curie
Comments should be sent to www-html-editor@w3.org
The review ending date is 10 June 2008.
3. C14N 1.1
See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#c14n1.1
The C14N 1.1 Recommendation has been published at
http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-c14n11-20080502/
4. XML 1.0
See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-errata
The XML 1.0 5th Edition PER has been published at
http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/PER-xml-20080205/
The PER period ended 16 May 2008.
We need to have at least three implementations that
pass the test suite for each of the errata that have
been newly applied to the 5th Edition.
Are there any implementations that have done this?
ACTION to Glenn: Check with Apache folks on status of
implementing XML 1.0 5th Edition.
ACTION to Henry: Check with Microsoft on status of
implementing XML 1.0 5th Edition.
ACTION to Richard: Check with Henry about the test suite
especially wrt 5th Ed tests.
5. XML 1.1
See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml1.1
XML 1.1 2nd Edition published 2006 August 16:
Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.1 (Second Edition)
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml11-20060816
6. XML Test Suite.
See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-test-suite
Henry/Richard discussed some test suite issues raised by Frans Englich:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-testsuite/2007Mar/
ACTION: Richard to construct a test case for these issues.
7. Namespaces in XML 1.0/1.1
See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.0 and
http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.1.
2nd Editions published 2006 August 16:
Namespaces in XML 1.0 (Second Edition)
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-names-20060816
Namespaces in XML 1.1 (Second Edition)
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-names11-20060816
Richard has updated the NS PE doc at
http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2001/05/proposed-xml-names-errata
NPE28 Links to Attribute production are wrong
---------------------------------------------
Richard suggests this is editorial and easily fixed.
NPE27 Prohibition of xmlns:x="" in 1.0 should be a Namespace Constraint
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NPE29 Uniqueness of attributes should be a Namespace Constraint
---------------------------------------------------------------
Richard notes that the spec already makes these points conformance
issues even though they aren't call a constraint, so he isn't sure
making them constraints is helpful, but we will continue to consider.
For NPE27, Richard already agrees in email with Anne that the
"may not" should become a 2119 "MUST NOT", so we should at least
make that change, and Paul would feel better if we got the
word "constraint" in here somehow.
ACTION to Richard: Update the NPE27 with some discussion/proposed
resolution that at least fixes the "may not" and perhaps includes
the word "constraint".
HT and Richard have noted another NS 1.0 PE, NPE30:
http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2001/05/proposed-xml-names-errata.html#NPE30
8. LEIRIs
See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#leiri
Martin's latest IRI draft (defining LEIRIs in section 7) is at
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-duerst-iri-bis-02.txt
Paul's summary of what comes next spec-by-spec is at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2007Dec/0045
ACTION to Henry: Do some pinging about the schedule of IRI bis.
9. XML Base 2nd Edition 2nd PER
See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-base
The (second) XML Base (Second Edition) PER has been published at
http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/PER-xmlbase-20080320/
and announced at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2008JanMar/0112
The XML Base PER review period ends 30 June 2008.
10. XLink update.
See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xlink1.1
The earlier XLink CR was published at
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/CR-xlink11-20060328/
The XLink 1.1 LC was published at
http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-xlink11-20080331/
and announced at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2008Apr/0006
The LC review period ended 16 May 2008.
Norm has prepared a DoC at
http://www.w3.org/XML/2008/05/xlinklc/
ACTION to Henry and Norm: Figure out how to get the XSD for
XLink at an accessible URI.
ACTION to Henry: Compare the XSD for XLink at
http://schemas.opengis.net/xlink/1.0.0/xlinks.xsd
with that in the XLink spec.
11. XInclude 3rd Edition
See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xinclude
XInclude 2nd Edition is at:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xinclude-20061115
See http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xinclude for
LEIRI-related changes for the 3rd Edition.
ACTION to Daniel: Produce a PER-ready draft of XInclude 3rd Ed
with appropriate references to the IRI RFC for LEIRIs.
[1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core
[2] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#tasks
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2008May/0013.html
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | A man is not necessarily intelligent
http://nwalsh.com/ | because he has plenty of ideas, any
| more than he is a good general because
| he has plenty of soldiers.-- Chamfort
Received on Monday, 2 June 2008 17:04:49 UTC