- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 11:25:28 -0400
- To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
Attendees --------- Paul Richard Daniel [3 organizations (3 with proxies) present out of 9] Regrets ------- Norm Henry Glenn Absent organizations -------------------- A-SIT Google IBM (with regrets) Mark Logic (with regrets) W3C (with regrets) François Yergeau We will meet next on June 4--regrets from Paul; Norm will chair. > 1. Accepting the minutes from the last telcon [3] and > the current task status [2] (have any questions, comments, > or corrections ready by the beginning of the call). Accepted. > > 2. Miscellaneous administrivia and document reviews. > > October Technical Plenary > ------------------------- > The next Technical Plenary is scheduled for October in Cannes: > http://www.w3.org/2008/10/TPAC/Overview.html > We have tentatively decided to meet there. > > --- > > There is a last call for: > > CURIE Syntax 1.0 > A syntax for expressing Compact URIs > http://www.w3.org/TR/curie > > Comments should be sent to www-html-editor@w3.org > > The review ending date is 10 June 2008. --- fwiw, the TAG has come out recommending against adoption of the OASIS XRI specification: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2008May/0078 > > 3. C14N 1.1 > > See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#c14n1.1 > > The C14N 1.1 Recommendation has been published at > http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-c14n11-20080502/ > > > 4. XML 1.0 > > See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-errata > > The XML 1.0 5th Edition PER has been published at > http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/PER-xml-20080205/ > > The PER period ended 16 May 2008. > > We need to have at least three implementations that > pass the test suite for each of the errata that have > been newly applied to the 5th Edition. > > Are there any implementations that have done this? Richard believes Henry made changes to Richard's parser to handle the extended ranges. In any case, he believes he could easily have a conforming application. DV hasn't done the changes yet, but he does plan to do so. ACTION to Glenn: Check with Apache folks on status of implementing XML 1.0 5th Edition. ACTION to Henry: Check with Microsoft on status of implementing XML 1.0 5th Edition. Henry has updated the test suite to have tests for the 5th Ed changes. Richard says one may need to alter the harness to allow someone to test against the 5th Ed version specifically. ACTION to Richard: Check with Henry about the test suite especially wrt 5th Ed tests. > > > 5. XML 1.1 > > See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml1.1 > > XML 1.1 2nd Edition published 2006 August 16: > > Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.1 (Second Edition) > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml11-20060816 > > > 6. XML Test Suite. > > See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-test-suite > > Henry/Richard discussed some test suite issues raised by > Frans Englich: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-testsuite/2007Mar/ > > ACTION: Richard to construct a test case for these issues. > > > 7. Namespaces in XML 1.0/1.1 > > See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.0 and > http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.1. > > 2nd Editions published 2006 August 16: > > Namespaces in XML 1.0 (Second Edition) > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-names-20060816 > > Namespaces in XML 1.1 (Second Edition) > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-names11-20060816 > > Richard has updated the NS PE doc at > http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2001/05/proposed-xml-names-errata > > NPE28 Links to Attribute production are wrong > --------------------------------------------- > Richard suggests this is editorial and easily fixed. > > NPE27 Prohibition of xmlns:x="" in 1.0 should be a Namespace > Constraint > -------------------------------------------------------------- > NPE29 Uniqueness of attributes should be a Namespace Constraint > --------------------------------------------------------------- > Richard notes that the spec already makes these points conformance > issues even though they aren't call a constraint, so he isn't sure > making them constraints is helpful, but we will continue to consider. > > For NPE27, Richard already agrees in email with Anne that the > "may not" should become a 2119 "MUST NOT", so we should at least > make that change, and Paul would feel better if we got the > word "constraint" in here somehow. > > ACTION to Richard: Update the NPE27 with some discussion/proposed > resolution that at least fixes the "may not" and perhaps includes > the word "constraint". > ACTION to Richard continued. HT and Richard have noted another NS 1.0 PE, NPE30: http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2001/05/proposed-xml-names-errata.html#NPE30 > > 8. LEIRIs > > See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#leiri > > Martin's latest IRI draft (defining LEIRIs in section 7) is at > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-duerst-iri-bis-02.txt > > Paul's summary of what comes next spec-by-spec is at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2007Dec/0045 > > ACTION to Henry: Do some pinging about the schedule of IRI bis. ACTION to Henry ongoing. > > > 9. XML Base 2nd Edition 2nd PER > > See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-base > > The (second) XML Base (Second Edition) PER has been published at > http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/PER-xmlbase-20080320/ > and announced at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2008JanMar/0112 > > The XML Base PER review period ends 30 June 2008. > > > 10. XLink update. > > See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xlink1.1 > > The earlier XLink CR was published at > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/CR-xlink11-20060328/ > > The XLink 1.1 LC was published at > http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-xlink11-20080331/ > and announced at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2008Apr/0006 > > The LC review period ended 16 May 2008. > > Norm has prepared a DoC at > http://www.w3.org/XML/2008/05/xlinklc/ > > ACTION to Henry and Norm: Figure out how to get the XSD for > XLink at an accessible URI. ACTION to Henry and continued. > > ACTION to Henry: Compare the XSD for XLink at > http://schemas.opengis.net/xlink/1.0.0/xlinks.xsd > with that in the XLink spec. ACTION to Henry continued. > > > 11. XInclude 3rd Edition > > See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xinclude > > XInclude 2nd Edition is at: > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xinclude-20061115 > > See http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xinclude for > LEIRI-related changes for the 3rd Edition. > > ACTION to Daniel: Produce a PER-ready draft of XInclude 3rd Ed > with appropriate references to the IRI RFC for LEIRIs. > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core > [2] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#tasks > [3] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2008May/0006 >
Received on Wednesday, 21 May 2008 15:28:10 UTC