- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 10:42:11 -0400
- To: <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
- Cc: "Martin Duerst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
Martin, Regarding http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-duerst-iri-bis-03.txt 1. I see that the first sentence of 7.1 still refers to IRIs instead of IRI-reference as we requested at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-core/2008JanMar/0056 2. I see that there is still no mention of the acronym LEIRI. The XML Core WG had discussed this at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2008May/0004 in response to a comment we got on XLink where we decided we should ask you to include this acronym in IRI-bis, and I thought I had emailed you with this request, but I can't find a record of such a message, so I may have failed to make this request. In the second sentence of the first paragraph of section 7, please change: This section provides a definition and a name (Legacy Extended IRI) to: This section provides a definition and a name (Legacy Extended IRI or LEIRI) or something similar. --- The XML Core WG has had about a half dozen specs on hold awaiting a referenceable IRI-bis, some for over a year. Last December at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2007Dec/0042 your email implied that IRI-bis would be in last call in January or February. We advanced several specs with this understanding, and now they are in limbo waiting until IRI-bis is referenceable. At our next XML Core telcon, it is my duty as chair to ask the WG if we think it is time to publish what is effectively section 7 of your latest draft and/or some modification of our previous HRRI draft as a W3C WG Note so that we can move ahead. paul
Received on Monday, 28 July 2008 14:44:57 UTC