- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 11:21:43 -0400
- To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Norman Walsh > Sent: Wednesday, 2008 July 16 10:37 > To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > Subject: Minutes for XML Core WG telcon of 2008 July 16 > | 8. LEIRIs > | > | See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#leiri > | > | Paul's summary of what comes next spec-by-spec is at > | http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2007Dec/0045 > | > | Martin's latest IRI draft (defining LEIRIs in section 7) has > | expired; a copy is at > | http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-duerst-iri-bis-02 > | > | A summary of what specs need to be revised to reference LEIRIs is at > | http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2007Dec/0045 > | > | ACTION to Henry: Do some pinging about the schedule of IRI bis > | pointing out that having the IRI-bis draft expired is a serious > | problem for us. > > Henry reports that there is a visible RFC draft again. But the minutes don't give a URL. Where is this draft? > It's on the > agenda for I18N core to discuss as a matter of business. That's the > best we can do at this point: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-core/2008JulSep/0000 I read that email. It's very depressing to me. It leads me to think that nothing is going to happen here for a long time. If anything, it sounds like Martin is less invested in doing anything here than before, and that wasn't much. Is it time to reconsider a WG Note (that is perhaps a copy of the latest section 7 of IRI-bis) defining LEIRIs so that we can have our half dozen specs refer to it? paul
Received on Monday, 21 July 2008 15:25:21 UTC