RE: Transition Request: PER Request for XML 1.0 5th Edition

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ian B. Jacobs [mailto:ij@w3.org] 
> Sent: Monday, 2008 January 28 9:45
> To: Grosso, Paul
> Cc: Jules Clement-Ripoche; François Yergeau; timbl@w3.org; 
> steve@w3.org; public-xml-core-wg@w3.org; webreq@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Transition Request: PER Request for XML 1.0 5th Edition
> 
> 
> On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 10:20 -0500, Grosso, Paul wrote:
> > I have completely given up trying to figure out IPP for
> > these older specs.  I just wait for Ian to give us whatever
> > magic incantation he wants us to put in there (which changes
> > every time we issue a new edition).
> > 
> > Ian?

> I propose, in the interest of stability, that we use exactly the
> same patent policy boilerplate as in XML 1.0 4E (even though I think
> the pubrules checker is correct to suggest adding the first sentence).
> 
> Any thoughts?

I assume that means we don't have to make any changes to what 
Francois has there right now, and that sounds perfect to me.

paul

Received on Monday, 28 January 2008 15:59:28 UTC