- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 10:20:11 -0500
- To: "Jules Clement-Ripoche" <jules@w3.org>, <ij@w3.org>, François Yergeau <francois@yergeau.com>
- Cc: <timbl@w3.org>, <steve@w3.org>, <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>, <webreq@w3.org>
Hi Jules, > -----Original Message----- > From: Jules Clement-Ripoche [mailto:jules@w3.org] > Sent: Monday, 2008 January 28 9:03 > To: Grosso, Paul > Cc: timbl@w3.org; steve@w3.org; public-xml-core-wg@w3.org; > webreq@w3.org; chairs@w3.org; w3t-comm@w3.org > Subject: Re: Transition Request: PER Request for XML 1.0 5th Edition > > Hi Paul, > > I've installed and checked your document in it's final location. > It appear to me that some of the namespaces doesn't seems to be valid: I don't think you mean namespaces, but just URI references. > http://www.textuality.com/boilerplate/OpenHatch.xml (2 occurrences) > -> 404 (Not Found) > http://www.xml.com/iso/isolat2-xml.entities (1 occurrence) > -> 404 (Not Found) Either the document editor (Francois) or I will look into these. > > Also, the pubrules[1] complain on something in the SOTD about > the IPP, so I'm not sure the text here is correct. I have completely given up trying to figure out IPP for these older specs. I just wait for Ian to give us whatever magic incantation he wants us to put in there (which changes every time we issue a new edition). Ian? > > Finally I suggest to replace the text "W3C Proposed Edited > Recommendation as of 18 January 2008 but tentatively targeted for > publication on 05 February 2008" on top, by simply "W3C > Proposed Edited Recommendation 05 February 2008". Yes, of course, we will do that before we issue a publications request. This was only a transitions request, not a pub request, so the document is not in its completely final form. We will have all these issues addressed before we make the publications request for this PER. thanks, paul > > Could you please have a quick look at this? > Thank you! > > [1] > http://www.w3.org/2005/08/online_xslt/xslt?xmlfile=http%3A%2F% > 2Fcgi.w3.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Ftidy-if%3FdocAddr%3Dhttp%253A%252F%25 > 2Fwww.w3.org%252FTR%252F2008%252FPER-xml-20080205%252F&xslfile > =http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2005%2F08%2Fonline_xslt%2Fxslt%3Fxm > lfile%3Dhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2005%2F07%2Fpubrules%253Fuim > ode%253Dchecker_full%2526year%253D2008%2526docstatus%253Dper-t > r%2526rectrack%253Don%2526prevrec%253Dnone%2526patpol%253Dw3c% > 2526normative%253Dyes%2526uri%253Dhttp%25253A%25252F%25252Fwww > .w3.org%25252FTR%25252F2008%25252FPER-xml-20080205%25252F%2526 > filterValues%253D%2526nscheckmanual%253D%2526display%253Dall%2 > 526recursive%253Doff%2526recurse_auth%253Don%26xslfile%3Dhttp% > 3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2005%2F09%2Fchecker%2Fframe.xsl%26display > %3Dall%26recurse_auth%3Don&uimode=checker_full&filterValues=&y > ear=2008&docstatus=per-tr&rectrack=on&prevrec=none&patpol=w3c& > normative=yes&doc_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FTR%2F2008%2FPE > R-xml-20080205%2F&recursive=off&nscheckmanual=&display=all&r > ecurse_auth=on > > Grosso, Paul wrote: > > As was pointed out to me, this transition request mentions > > (in its supposed copy of the SOTD) a particular erratum [PE160]. > > This terminology reflects what the WG calls "potential errata" > > until they are added to the Errata document. > > > > As properly reflected in the actual SOTD at > > http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2008/01/PER-xml-20080205/ > > what should be referenced is: > > > > erratum [E09] [which] relaxes the restrictions on element > > and attribute names, thereby providing in XML 1.0 the major > > end user benefit currently achievable only by using XML 1.1. > > > > and [E09] is a link to http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V10-4e-errata#E09 > > > > You can also see section 2.3 Common Syntactic Constructs in > > the review copy at > > > http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2008/01/PER-xml-20080205/PER-xml-2 > 0080205-re > > view.html#sec-common-syn > > and note the several changed sections marked [E09] (as well as > > appendix B which has been deleted and appendix J which has > > been added) to see the changes related to this erratum. > > > > paul > > [...] > > -- > Jules Clement-Ripoche <jules@w3.org> World Wide Web Consortium > W3C Systems Team - Webmaster http://www.w3.org/ > Voice: +1 617 258 8143 MIT/CSAIL Build. 32-G504 >
Received on Monday, 28 January 2008 15:25:03 UTC