XLink 1.1 LC draft

I put up a new draft at

  http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/xmlcore/xlink11/

I don't recall, off the top of my head, what we thought needed
changing beyond what's already been done. I also don't understand
the following pubrules complaint:

> 12. It MUST include this text related to patent policy requirements
> (with suitable links inserted; see guidelines for linking to
> disclosure pages):
> 
>     This document was produced by a group operating under the 5
>     February 2004 W3C Patent Policy. W3C maintains a public list of
>     any patent disclosures made in connection with the deliverables of
>     the group; that page also includes instructions for disclosing a
>     patent. An individual who has actual knowledge of a patent which
>     the individual believes contains Essential Claim(s) must disclose
>     the information in accordance with section 6 of the W3C Patent
>     Policy.
> 
> Include this source code:
> <p> This document was produced by a group operating under the <a
> href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/">5 February
> 2004 W3C Patent Policy</a>. W3C maintains a <a rel="disclosure"
> href="@@URI to IPP status or other page@@">public list of any patent
> disclosures</a> made in connection with the deliverables of the group;
> that page also includes instructions for disclosing a patent. An
> individual who has actual knowledge of a patent which the individual
> believes contains <a
> href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/#def-essential">Essential
> Claim(s)</a> must disclose the information in accordance with <a
> href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/#sec-Disclosure">section
> 6 of the W3C Patent Policy</a>. </p>
> 
> Note: Contact the Communications Team for suitable adaptations in the
> case where a document has been published jointly by more than one
> group. In the adaptation, be sure that the text for informative-only
> specs or specs not going to Rec is the same as the standard text.
> 
>     * Error. Although the boilerplate text is correct, there is an
>       inconsistency with respect to IPP for the group identified by
>       http://www.w3.org/XML/Core/: Error. The group is not known to
>       IPP but is indicated as being under the W3C Patent Policy. This
>       may indicate that the document status text is inconsistent with
>       the patent policy for the group, that the group has not been
>       added to IPP, or that the URI for the group home page in the
>       status section differs from the one known to IPP.

I'll try to get a diff from the CR asap.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | There has never been a perfect
http://nwalsh.com/            | government, because men have passions;
                              | and if they did not have passions,
                              | there would be no need for
                              | government.-- Voltaire