- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 11:36:21 -0500
- To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
Attendees --------- Glenn xx:26 Norm xx:20 Paul Richard Henry Daniel [6 organizations (6 with proxies) present out of 9] Regrets ------- Absent organizations -------------------- ASIT Google François Yergeau > 1. Accepting the minutes from the last telcon [3] and > the current task status [2] (have any questions, comments, > or corrections ready by the beginning of the call). Accepted. > 2. Miscellaneous administrivia and document reviews. > > > 3. XML 1.0 > > See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-errata > > The XML 1.0 5th Edition Recommendation is at > http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-20081126/ > > > 4. XML Test Suite. > > See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-test-suite > > ACTION to Richard: Construct a test case for the XML test suite > issues raised by Frans Englich: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-testsuite/2007Mar/ > > > 5. Namespaces in XML 1.0/1.1 > > See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.0 and > http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.1. > > Richard has partially updated the NS PE doc at > http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2001/05/proposed-xml-names-errata.html > > Richard added some discussion at > http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2001/05/proposed-xml-names-errata.html#npe29 > The WG agreed with his direction and asked that he go forward with it. > > ACTION to Richard: Fill in a proposed resolution for NPE29. > > The NS 1.0 2nd Ed Errata document at > http://www.w3.org/XML/2006/xml-names-errata > now includes NE17 which addresses what would otherwise have > been definitions of NCName and friends that were out of sync > with XML 1.0 5th Ed. > > ACTION to Richard: Update the PE document to indicate that > NPE31 and NPE32 have now been published as errata NE17 and > NE18 respectively. Done > > 6. LEIRIs > > See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#leiri > > A summary of what specs need to be revised to reference LEIRIs is at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2007Dec/0045 > And the list is: XML 1.0 6th Edition XML 1.1 3rd Edition XML Base 2nd Edition XLink 1.1 (First Edition) XInclude 3rd Edition > Martin's has made a new latest version of IRI-bis available at > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-duerst-iri-bis-04 > > The progression of XML Base, XLink, and XInclude > (and XML 1.0 6th Ed) all must await this note. > > The WG Note defining LEIRIs is published at > http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/NOTE-leiri-20081103/ > > > 7. XML Base 2nd Edition 2nd PER > > See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-base > > The (second) XML Base (Second Edition) PER has been published at > http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/PER-xmlbase-20080320/ > and announced at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2008JanMar/0112 > > The XML Base PER review period ended 30 June 2008. > > Richard developed a DoC document for XML Base at > http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2008/09/xmlbase-2e/disposition.html > > The lastest draft of the spec is at > http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2006/09/xmlbase-2e/ > > ACTION to Richard: Update the spec to reference the LEIRI note > (and give it a date). Richard has added the LEIRI reference. He will make a boilerplate pass. > > ACTION to Henry: Take XML Base 2nd Ed to Rec. > > > 8. XLink 1.1. > > See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xlink1.1 > > The earlier XLink CR was published at > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/CR-xlink11-20060328/ > > The XLink 1.1 LC was published at > http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-xlink11-20080331/ > > The LC review period ended 16 May 2008. > > Norm has prepared a DoC at > http://www.w3.org/XML/2008/05/xlinklc/ > > ACTION to Henry: Continue to get the XSD for > XLink at an accessible URI. > > There's an open question about whether the XSD/DTD > should default the xlink:type attribute value. > None of this effects our last call because the > XSD/DTD are not normative. > > John asked whether we should have two schemas, one for > each of our conformance levels. > > ACTION to Henry, John: Think about having a basic level > conformance XSD for XLink. > > Paul asks us to consider skipping CR and going directly to PR. > > ACTION to Henry: Review the history and make a recommendation > as to whether we should skip CR and go directly to PR. > > > 9. XInclude 3rd Edition > > See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xinclude > > XInclude 2nd Edition is at: > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xinclude-20061115 > > See http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xinclude for > LEIRI-related changes for the 3rd Edition. > > ACTION to Daniel: Produce a PER-ready draft of XInclude 3rd Ed > with appropriate references to the IRI RFC for LEIRIs. > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core > [2] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#tasks > [3] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2008Nov/0026 >
Received on Wednesday, 3 December 2008 16:37:52 UTC