- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 16:38:23 +0100
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: xml-names-editor@w3.org, annevk@opera.com, public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
This is a vexed question. A quick look at your document suggest some
pretty good wording, e.g.
"The prefix of a qualified name may be omitted to indicate that the
name belongs to no namespace."
That's exactly right, and doesn't seem awkward. Could you give some
examples of wording you're not so happy with?
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFID1fwkjnJixAXWBoRAnbAAJ4zhuKHtNRlcg2nYRK3o8/w8FP5UgCdHy5q
lsVpf7k+lsTlDDw01ukQsQE=
=AsUc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 23 April 2008 15:39:27 UTC