- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 11:44:20 -0400
- To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
We have an XML Core WG phone call scheduled for Wednesday, October 24, from 08:00-09:00 Pacific time aka 11:00-12:00 Eastern time aka 15:00-16:00 UTC 16:00-17:00 in Ireland and the UK 17:00-18:00 in middle (most of) Europe on the Zakim W3C Bridge, +1 617 761 6200, passcode 9652#. We also use IRC channel #xmlcore on irc.w3.org:6665 . ************************************************************** In case anyone is wondering, all WG members that customarily dial into the XML Core call are in locales that are still observing DST this week. By the time of our f2f (which is our next meeting after this week), we will all be observing standard time. Note, however, that the UK and Europe shift back to standard time this Sunday October 28th whereas North America doesn't shift back to standard time until Sunday November 4. So if you are traveling from Europe to North America between Oct 28 and Nov 4, be aware of local time issues. ************************************************************** See the XML Core group page [1] for pointers to current documents and other information. If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list before the start of the telcon. Please also review our group page's task list [2] for accuracy and completeness and be prepared to amend if necessary and accept it at the beginning of the call. Regrets from Norm. Agenda ====== 1. Accepting the minutes from the last telcon [3] and the current task status [2] (have any questions, comments, or corrections ready by the beginning of the call). 2. Miscellaneous administrivia and document reviews. TP Week f2f ----------- Our next meeting will be our f2f in Boston. If you are not attending in person, please plan to use IRC and dial in. See the draft agenda for dial in info. The draft agenda for the TP week f2f is at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2007/09/xml-f2f-20071105-agenda.htm EXI first WD ------------ Title: Efficient XML Interchange (EXI) Format 1.0 Pre pub URI: http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/EXI/docs/format/exi.html Post pub TR URI: http://www.w3.org/TR/exi/ John's review is at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2007Aug/0012 ACTION to John: Send in the technical comments with a note that we have higher level comments to come. 3. C14N The C14N 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published at http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/CR-xml-c14n11-20070621 Known Issues with Canonical XML 1.0 (C14N/1.0) WG Note has been published at http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/NOTE-C14N-issues-20061220/ Using XML Digital Signatures in the 2006 XML Environment WG Note has been published at http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/NOTE-DSig-usage-20061220/ C14N 1.1 Interoperability testing was performed on 27 September. A report of the outcome is at: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-canonicalization-comments/20 07Oct/0000 Regarding the change from 1.0 to 1.1 highlighted in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2007Aug/0018 we will revert to 1.0 wording. Regarding point 2 of the interoperability email, it sounds like the issue is explained well in the email. Glenn will try to propose some wording to the XML Core list. ACTION to Glenn: Propose some new wording to address point 2 of the interoperability testing feedback email. Point 3 complains about appendix A being too difficult to understand, partly because it uses 3986 language which is also hard to understand. ACTION to Konrad: Send us pointers to suggestions for rewriting appendix A. One such pointer is http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Sep/0017 4. xml:base, [baseURI], and IRIs -> HRRIs The (Second Edition) PER has been published at http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/PER-xmlbase-20061220/ It's now waiting for us to say what should happen next--whether we want a Director's call now or not. We need to remember to correct the IP part of the Status section per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2007JanMar/ 0000 Mike Kay thinks the defn of XML Resource Identifier is too vague. We decided to write an RFC to define XML Resource Identifier. The plan is to get this to an RFC and then reference it from XML Base (which we can then take to REC) and others. 4.5. HRRI RFC The latest HRRI draft was published as an ID on May 14 at http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-walsh-tobin-hrri-01.txt The most recent editor's draft is at http://www.w3.org/XML/2007/04/hrri/draft-walsh-tobin-hrri-01c.html Henry sent email to I18N Core suggesting our LEIRI solution at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2007Aug/0032 Martin recently replied at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2007Oct/0009 pointing to a new IRI draft at http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-duerst-iri-bis-01.txt that contains a first pass defining LEIRIs. ACTION to Norm, Richard, and others: Review Martin's draft LEIRI text. 5. XLink update. The XLink CR was published at http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/CR-xlink11-20060328/ The latest almost PR-ready XLink draft is at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/xmlcore/xlink11/ Norm posted a DoC at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2006/10/xlink11-doc.html Paul wrote a SECOND draft PR request at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2006Dec/0059 ACTION to Norm: Complete resolution of DoC. ACTION to WG (need volunteer): Update the Implementation Report. ACTION to Norm: Produce PR-ready draft. ACTION to Norm: Produce diff/review version. HOWEVER, the actions here are pending until we get the HRRI RFC since we plan to reference it from XLink. 6. XML 1.0/1.1 4th/2nd Editions published 2006 August 16: Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Fourth Edition) http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-20060816 Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.1 (Second Edition) http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml11-20060816 The following XML PE are in countdown until THIS telcon: PE156 Inclusion of external entities PE157 UTF-16 and Byte Order Mark PE158 UTF-8 BOM PE159 No < in Attribute Values See http://www.w3.org/XML/2006/08/proposed-xml10-4e-and-xml11-2e-errata for further details ---- Henry/Richard discussed the test suite issues raised by Frans Englich: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-testsuite/2007Mar/ These need to be resolved. Richard reports that the 2005 issue has been resolved in the latest draft. The one from 2006, character references with numbers with dozens of digits, may not be. ACTION: Richard to construct a test case for these issues. 7. Namespaces in XML 1.0/1.1 2nd Editions published 2006 August 16: Namespaces in XML 1.0 (Second Edition) http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-names-20060816 Namespaces in XML 1.1 (Second Edition) http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-names11-20060816 Richard has recorded Anne's issue/proposed resolution at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2001/05/proposed-xml-names-errata#NPE27 8. XML 1.1 deployment. [1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core [2] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#tasks [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2007Oct/0008
Received on Monday, 22 October 2007 15:45:16 UTC