- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 11:14:14 -0400
- To: "Martin Duerst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- Cc: <public-iri@w3.org>, "Richard Ishida" <ishida@w3.org>, "Felix Sasaki" <fsasaki@w3.org>, <www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org>, <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
Martin et al., Please check out http://www.w3.org/XML/2007/04/hrri/draft-walsh-tobin-hrri-01c.html and let us know whether you have any further comments or are satisfied with this (draft) ID. In either case, please send a response. Several specs are on hold awaiting progression of this to RFC, and we would like to be sure to make progress. We would prefer to have a definite response from you, but if we have not heard by 11:00 ET (Boston time) this Wednesday, we will assume you have no more comments on this spec. paul > -----Original Message----- > From: public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Norman Walsh > Sent: Tuesday, 2007 June 12 12:25 > To: Martin Duerst > Cc: public-iri@w3.org; Richard Ishida; Felix Sasaki; > www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org; public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: HRRIs, IRIs, etc > > / Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> was heard to say: > | Dear IRI and XML experts, > [...] > | - The IRI spec excludes private use characters from all but > the query part. > > We have attempted to address this concern[1] by adding > > * characters in the Unicode private use area (#xE000-#xF8FF), except > where they appear in the query part of the resulting IRI. > > to the list. > > | (there are other smaller differences, but for the moment, > this is enough) > > Could you, please, provide a more exhaustive account of the > differences which concern you? The Core WG thinks it would be most > efficient if we could consider as many of them as possible at the same > time. [1] http://www.w3.org/XML/2007/04/hrri/draft-walsh-tobin-hrri-01c.html
Received on Monday, 18 June 2007 15:14:44 UTC