- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 16:19:29 +0000
- To: "Grosso, Paul" <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Cc: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Looks good to me -- a few cosmetic changes suggested below:
Grosso, Paul writes:
> The CR comments have been considered and resolved, and
> a notification of the fact sent to every commenter. There
> were no outstanding objections raised during the CR period.
[clarify whether we got agreement, or there were no objections? Move
the DoC para. below to be part of this para?]
> The document being sent to PR contains changes made to
> accommodate CR feedback. The changes made between CR and
> PR were editorial corrections or clarifications suggested
> by the implementation experience. Review versions with
xxxx
> differences highlighted are available as described in the SOTD.
>
> There is an Implementation Report at
> http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/interop/xmldsig/c14n11/report.html
The above para. appears twice. . .
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHaUSSkjnJixAXWBoRAowKAJ9Bw3sChYDqs9NybmWlQM7pnEUvyACfSEoJ
daSD3wqQAC6r7U2ZCyzkkl8=
=j0Ab
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 19 December 2007 16:19:39 UTC