- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 14:35:43 -0400
- To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Norman Walsh > Sent: Monday, 2007 April 30 13:27 > To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > Subject: Re: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-walsh-tobin-hrri-00.txt > > / John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org> was heard to say: > |> Now what is the next step? Is there some minimum time before > |> we can request it be published as an RFC? If we publish a > |> new (non-RFC) draft, then does that restart whatever clock > |> there is before we can request it go to RFC? > | > | It can be processed as an independent submission by sending email > | to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. No specific delay is imposed, but > | the IETF will review it. > > I suggest we let two weeks tick by, make the edits Paul suggested and > address any other comments, then produce a draft...-01. > > If, two weeks later, there are no new comments, I suggest we ask the > IETF to publish it as an RFC. I like that plan. paul
Received on Monday, 30 April 2007 18:38:16 UTC