RE: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-walsh-tobin-hrri-00.txt

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Norman Walsh
> Sent: Monday, 2007 April 30 13:27
> To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-walsh-tobin-hrri-00.txt
> 
> / John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org> was heard to say:
> |> Now what is the next step?  Is there some minimum time before
> |> we can request it be published as an RFC?  If we publish a
> |> new (non-RFC) draft, then does that restart whatever clock
> |> there is before we can request it go to RFC?
> |
> | It can be processed as an independent submission by sending email
> | to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  No specific delay is imposed, but
> | the IETF will review it.
> 
> I suggest we let two weeks tick by, make the edits Paul suggested and
> address any other comments, then produce a draft...-01.
> 
> If, two weeks later, there are no new comments, I suggest we ask the
> IETF to publish it as an RFC.

I like that plan.

paul

Received on Monday, 30 April 2007 18:38:16 UTC