- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 14:27:16 -0400
- To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <87slahpvjv.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org> was heard to say: |> Now what is the next step? Is there some minimum time before |> we can request it be published as an RFC? If we publish a |> new (non-RFC) draft, then does that restart whatever clock |> there is before we can request it go to RFC? | | It can be processed as an independent submission by sending email | to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. No specific delay is imposed, but | the IETF will review it. I suggest we let two weeks tick by, make the edits Paul suggested and address any other comments, then produce a draft...-01. If, two weeks later, there are no new comments, I suggest we ask the IETF to publish it as an RFC. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | A wonder is often expressed that the http://nwalsh.com/ | greatest criminals look like other men. | The reason is that *they are like other | men in many respects.*-- Hazlitt
Received on Monday, 30 April 2007 18:27:28 UTC