RE: Publication Request: First Public Working Draft of C14N 1.1 and two WG Notes

Hi all,

Please publish these as "Working Drafts" until you are all done, at
which point publish them as Working Group Notes. Please state your
expectations in the status section: that the WG expects to publish this
as a Note at some point.

"Working Draft" does not (for historical reasons) imply "going to Rec."

Hope that helps,

 _ Ian


On Mon, 2006-09-11 at 17:07 -0400, Grosso, Paul wrote:
>  
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jean-Guilhem Rouel [mailto:jean-gui@w3.org] 
> > Sent: Monday, 2006 September 11 15:49
> > To: Grosso, Paul
> > Cc: webreq; Liam Quin; Philippe Le Hegaret; Henry S. 
> > Thompson; public-xml-core-wg@w3.org; Ian B. Jacobs
> > Subject: Re: Publication Request: First Public Working Draft 
> > of C14N 1.1 and two WG Notes
> > 
> > Hi Paul,
> > 
> > It's OK for me, but I CC Ian to have his opinion.
> > BTW, I don't really understand the status of the two other documents.
> > You say that they are notes (so do the URIs), but the documents
> > themselves are written as Working Draft. This is not normal and that's
> > why the errors are raised. Maybe Ian can confirm that (I can 
> > be wrong),
> > but I think this is a problem and thus has to be changed.
> > 
> 
> I await Ian's comments.
> 
> These documents are WG Notes (not Rec-track), but they
> aren't final yet.  So they are working drafts of WG Notes.
> 
> I await to hear how we're supposed to handle these.
> 
> paul
> 
> > Regards,
> > Jean-Gui
> > 
> > Grosso, Paul a écrit :
> > > Hi Jean-Gui,
> > > 
> > > The XML Core WG would like to publish just that diff
> > > document for the first public working draft.  It's
> > > important that reviewers can see just what we are
> > > proposing to change.  At this point, we do not have
> > > a more "real" document.
> > > 
> > > We will, of course, have a "real" document for
> > > subsequent drafts, but for now this is what we
> > > hope to publish this week.
> > > 
> > > I hope this is okay with you.
> > > 
> > > thanks,
> > > 
> > > paul 
> > > 
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Jean-Guilhem Rouel [mailto:jean-gui@w3.org] 
> > >> Sent: Monday, 2006 September 11 10:55
> > >> To: Grosso, Paul
> > >> Cc: webreq; Liam Quin; Philippe Le Hegaret; Henry S. 
> > >> Thompson; public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> > >> Subject: Re: Publication Request: First Public Working Draft 
> > >> of C14N 1.1 and two WG Notes
> > >>
> > >> Hello Paul,
> > >>
> > >> http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2006/09/WD-xml-c14n11-20060915.htm
> > >> l is only
> > >> a diff document. Can you provide the real document?
> > >>
> > >> Thank you,
> > >> Jean-Gui
> > >>
> > >> Grosso, Paul a écrit :
> > >>> The XML Core WG requests publication of the following 
> > >>> three documents:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> * First WD of an XML Core WG Note:
> > >>>   Known Issues with Canonical XML 1.0 (C14N/1.0)
> > >>> http://www.w3.org/2006/04/c14n-note/c14n-note.html
> > >>>
> > >>> * First WD of an XML Core WG Note:
> > >>>   Using XML Digital Signatures in the 2006 XML Environment
> > >>> http://www.w3.org/2006/04/c14n-note/dsig2006-note.html
> > >>>
> > >>> * First WD of the Recommendation track:
> > >>>   Canonical XML 1.1
> > >>> http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2006/09/WD-xml-c14n11-20060915.html
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> The above URLs are the publication-ready versions as of 
> > >>> 2006 September 8, but dated September 15th in anticipation
> > >>> of publication at that time.  
> > >>>
> > >>> They are written to be published by being copied as-is into 
> > >>> the following locations:
> > >>>
> > >>> * First WD of an XML Core WG Note:
> > >>>   Known Issues with Canonical XML 1.0 (C14N/1.0)
> > >>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/NOTE-C14N-20060915/Overview.html
> > >>>
> > >>> * First WD of an XML Core WG Note:
> > >>>   Using XML Digital Signatures in the 2006 XML Environment
> > >>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/NOTE-DSIG2006-20060915/Overview.html
> > >>>
> > >>> * First WD of the Recommendation track:
> > >>>   Canonical XML 1.1
> > >>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xml-c14n11-20060915/Overview.html
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> The Director approved publication in an email sent
> > >>> Thu 2006-09-07 17:20 EDT cc-ing webreq (but not
> > >>> archived in any archive to which I have permission).
> > >>>
> > >>> The two Notes pass pubrules except for errors because
> > >>> pubrules thinks they are WDs of Rec-track documents
> > >>> instead of WDs of Notes.
> > >>>
> > >>> The WD passes pubrules.
> > >>>
> > >>> Paul Grosso for the XML Core WG
> > 
-- 
Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                     +1 718 260-9447