RE: Publication Request: First Public Working Draft of C14N 1.1 and two WG Notes

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jean-Guilhem Rouel [mailto:jean-gui@w3.org] 
> Sent: Monday, 2006 September 11 15:49
> To: Grosso, Paul
> Cc: webreq; Liam Quin; Philippe Le Hegaret; Henry S. 
> Thompson; public-xml-core-wg@w3.org; Ian B. Jacobs
> Subject: Re: Publication Request: First Public Working Draft 
> of C14N 1.1 and two WG Notes
> 
> Hi Paul,
> 
> It's OK for me, but I CC Ian to have his opinion.
> BTW, I don't really understand the status of the two other documents.
> You say that they are notes (so do the URIs), but the documents
> themselves are written as Working Draft. This is not normal and that's
> why the errors are raised. Maybe Ian can confirm that (I can 
> be wrong),
> but I think this is a problem and thus has to be changed.
> 

I await Ian's comments.

These documents are WG Notes (not Rec-track), but they
aren't final yet.  So they are working drafts of WG Notes.

I await to hear how we're supposed to handle these.

paul

> Regards,
> Jean-Gui
> 
> Grosso, Paul a écrit :
> > Hi Jean-Gui,
> > 
> > The XML Core WG would like to publish just that diff
> > document for the first public working draft.  It's
> > important that reviewers can see just what we are
> > proposing to change.  At this point, we do not have
> > a more "real" document.
> > 
> > We will, of course, have a "real" document for
> > subsequent drafts, but for now this is what we
> > hope to publish this week.
> > 
> > I hope this is okay with you.
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > paul 
> > 
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Jean-Guilhem Rouel [mailto:jean-gui@w3.org] 
> >> Sent: Monday, 2006 September 11 10:55
> >> To: Grosso, Paul
> >> Cc: webreq; Liam Quin; Philippe Le Hegaret; Henry S. 
> >> Thompson; public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> >> Subject: Re: Publication Request: First Public Working Draft 
> >> of C14N 1.1 and two WG Notes
> >>
> >> Hello Paul,
> >>
> >> http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2006/09/WD-xml-c14n11-20060915.htm
> >> l is only
> >> a diff document. Can you provide the real document?
> >>
> >> Thank you,
> >> Jean-Gui
> >>
> >> Grosso, Paul a écrit :
> >>> The XML Core WG requests publication of the following 
> >>> three documents:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> * First WD of an XML Core WG Note:
> >>>   Known Issues with Canonical XML 1.0 (C14N/1.0)
> >>> http://www.w3.org/2006/04/c14n-note/c14n-note.html
> >>>
> >>> * First WD of an XML Core WG Note:
> >>>   Using XML Digital Signatures in the 2006 XML Environment
> >>> http://www.w3.org/2006/04/c14n-note/dsig2006-note.html
> >>>
> >>> * First WD of the Recommendation track:
> >>>   Canonical XML 1.1
> >>> http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2006/09/WD-xml-c14n11-20060915.html
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The above URLs are the publication-ready versions as of 
> >>> 2006 September 8, but dated September 15th in anticipation
> >>> of publication at that time.  
> >>>
> >>> They are written to be published by being copied as-is into 
> >>> the following locations:
> >>>
> >>> * First WD of an XML Core WG Note:
> >>>   Known Issues with Canonical XML 1.0 (C14N/1.0)
> >>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/NOTE-C14N-20060915/Overview.html
> >>>
> >>> * First WD of an XML Core WG Note:
> >>>   Using XML Digital Signatures in the 2006 XML Environment
> >>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/NOTE-DSIG2006-20060915/Overview.html
> >>>
> >>> * First WD of the Recommendation track:
> >>>   Canonical XML 1.1
> >>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xml-c14n11-20060915/Overview.html
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The Director approved publication in an email sent
> >>> Thu 2006-09-07 17:20 EDT cc-ing webreq (but not
> >>> archived in any archive to which I have permission).
> >>>
> >>> The two Notes pass pubrules except for errors because
> >>> pubrules thinks they are WDs of Rec-track documents
> >>> instead of WDs of Notes.
> >>>
> >>> The WD passes pubrules.
> >>>
> >>> Paul Grosso for the XML Core WG
>

Received on Monday, 11 September 2006 22:47:51 UTC