- From: Richard Tobin <richard@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 14:29:54 +0100 (BST)
- To: Konrad Lanz <Konrad.Lanz@iaik.tugraz.at>, Richard Tobin <richard@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Cc: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
Konrad, thanks for your comments. > * Please, change <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" > http-equiv="Content-Type"> to <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" > http-equiv="Content-Type"> otherwise the TOC looks like in the > attachment "TOC.PNG" in my Browser. This seems to be a problem with the diffspec stylesheet, which is inserting a meta element in addition to the one automatically produced by the XSLT processor. Norm? > * How about changing the last sentence in section 5.2 "Granularity of > base URI information" to > """ > The base URI of an element bearing an |xml:base| attribute having a > value that is not a valid XML Resource Identifier is undefined and SHOULD > cause an error on URI resolution. > """ The sentence comes from an erratum agreed in 2004. Changing it in the way you suggest would amount to a new erratum. I don't recall why we decided it was application-dependent - does anyone? > * May I further suggest to add the following sentence to section 5.4 > "Interpretation of same-document references". > """ > Hence, |xml:base="" or ||xml:base="#fragment"| do not have any effect > and SHOULD not be used. > """ It seems a bit strange to say the people SHOULD NOT use a value just because it's useless. And xml:base="foo" is just as useless. But it might be a good idea to add a note that some implementations implement this incorrectly, so it should (lower-case) be avoided. -- Richard
Received on Wednesday, 25 October 2006 13:30:24 UTC