- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 11:28:49 -0400
- To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
The XML Core WG telcons are every other week. Our next telcon will be October 25th. Status and open actions ======================= XBL2 Review ----------- > http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/xbl2/Overview.html?content-type =text/html > Editor's copy (more up to date) > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xbl-20060907/ > Snapshot for TR page (last call version; outdated) fwiw, here are a few reviews/notes one might want to read for some other XML Activity members' thoughts: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-cg/2006Sep/0002 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-cg/2006Sep/0012 ACTION to Norm: Review this WD. C14N ---- This latest draft is at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2006/09/WD-xml-c14n11-20060928.html > Richard thinks the "diff markup" of 3986 is enlightening > and should actually appear in the spec. We're not sure how to reflect this in the text of the spec. ACTION to Glenn: Try to reflect this in some way. ACTION to Glenn: Update C14N 1.1 to reference 3986 instead of 2396. XML Base -------- Richard updated the spec some more just before this telcon, and he thinks we are about ready to go. But Richard thinks we might want to publish this as a WD before going to PER. ACTION to Henry: Check into our options here for doing a WD of a PER. ACTION to Konrad: Review Richard's latest draft at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2006/09/xmlbase-2e/ XLink ----- The XLink CR was published at http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/CR-xlink11-20060328/ Paul wrote a draft PR request at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2006Jul/0001 ACTION to Norm: Create an XLink DoC. ACTION to Norm: Post to the WG mailing list something to show that any valid XLink 1.1 document can be programmatically converted into an equivalent XLink 1.0 document. ACTION to Norm: Provide a few more tests for the test suite. The old version XLink in section 5.5, we talk about values of href attributes. In the new version, we talk about IRIs and XML Resource Identifiers and other ways of encoding. So it's unclear now what to do about spaces in href attributes. Norm thinks instead of spaces, we should now say non-URI characters. ACTION to Norm: Make a suggestion how best to fix this. Also, nowhere do we say that conversion from an XML Resource Identifier to an IRI must occur as late as possible. Suggested new wording: If required, the IRI reference resulting from converting an XML Resource Identifier can be converted to a URI reference by following the prescriptions of Section 3.1 of [RFC 3987]. The conversion from an XML Resource Identifiers to an IRI must be performed only when absolutely necessary and as late as possible in a processing chain. In particular, neither the process of converting a relative XML Resource Identifier to an absolute one nor the process of passing an XML Resource Identifier to a process or software component responsible for dereferencing it should trigger escaping. ACTION to Norm: Implement the new wording in XLink 1.1. XML 1.0/1.1 ----------- ACTION to Francois: Update the PE document per last telcon's decisions. ACTION to Francois: Respond to Dieter saying we'll fix the 152 and 153 typos but explaining for 153 that we really mean the "not". Namespaces 1.0/1.1 ------------------ ACTION to Richard: Record Anne's issue/proposed resolution in the Namespace PE document.
Received on Monday, 16 October 2006 15:32:01 UTC