- From: Richard Tobin <richard@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 16:37:37 +0000 (GMT)
- To: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson), daniel@veillard.com
- Cc: John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>, public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> This leaves only the case where the document [base URI] is not known. > Will this work to avoid a negative impact of '../../...'?: > > In the absence of a document [base URI], assume one of the form > "file:/a/a/a/" > with more 'a' steps then the total number of '..' steps in all the > xml:base in the document That's the kind of hack I was thinking of. -- Richard
Received on Wednesday, 15 March 2006 16:37:48 UTC