- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 12:22:00 +0000
- To: "Grosso, Paul" <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Cc: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Grosso, Paul writes:
> So we all agree [the should->SHOULD change in 2.13] should go back to SHOULD.
Done.
But John Cowan suggested another retraction, in section 5.1. I've
tentatively reverted that should->SHOULD as well. . .
New version [1] available now.
ht
[1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2006/02/xml11-20060222.xml
- --
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEDsxokjnJixAXWBoRAhVcAJ9HqiItRSOJl6KfytOS8YIW0DxrowCfdokA
3ae3qna7Ozp9tonxpso60nE=
=ifJv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 8 March 2006 12:22:10 UTC