RE: Paul's review of John and Henry's 2119-ification

• From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
• Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 09:49:02 -0500
• To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <CF83BAA719FD2C439D25CBB1C9D1D30202958498@HQ-MAIL4.ptcnet.ptc.com>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henry S. Thompson [mailto:ht@inf.ed.ac.uk] 
> Sent: Wednesday, 2006 March 08 6:22
> To: Grosso, Paul
> Cc: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Paul's review of John and Henry's 2119-ification
> 
> Grosso, Paul writes:
> 
> > So we all agree [the should->SHOULD change in 2.13] should 
> go back to SHOULD.
> 
> Done.
> 
> But John Cowan suggested another retraction, in section 5.1.  I've
> tentatively reverted that should->SHOULD as well. . .

Yes, I didn't say anything, but this retraction
made sense to me too.

> New version [1] available now.

Thanks!

> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2006/02/xml11-20060222.xml

Received on Wednesday, 8 March 2006 14:53:21 UTC