- From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 12:42:43 -0400
- To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Cc: Richard Tobin <richard@inf.ed.ac.uk>, public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 16:36 +0100, Henry S. Thompson wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Philippe Le Hegaret writes: > > > It does not, since IETF policy is to deprecate an RFC in favor of its > > updated version. I didn't mean to suggest to update for the PER either. > > The drafts are ready now. But I don't see why it can't be done for the > > REC version. > > The group has just agreed they'd like to do this -- could you confirm > for the record that it's your opinion that making this change is > OK without going back through PER again, i.e. we'll ask the Director > on the 'phone call to direct us to make this change as we go to Edited > Rec. I don't believe the Group would need to go back to through PER again because they happen to update their references section appropriately. Philippe
Received on Wednesday, 28 June 2006 16:42:51 UTC