- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 16:36:05 +0100
- To: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- Cc: Richard Tobin <richard@inf.ed.ac.uk>, public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Philippe Le Hegaret writes:
> It does not, since IETF policy is to deprecate an RFC in favor of its
> updated version. I didn't mean to suggest to update for the PER either.
> The drafts are ready now. But I don't see why it can't be done for the
> REC version.
The group has just agreed they'd like to do this -- could you confirm
for the record that it's your opinion that making this change is
OK without going back through PER again, i.e. we'll ask the Director
on the 'phone call to direct us to make this change as we go to Edited
Rec.
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEoqHmkjnJixAXWBoRAp7mAJ9z2eoa0jU9b9eOHRyZP2rDpxfUGACfca4d
BcWrYFbHIsryYJwmSjsJjOE=
=vCpq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 28 June 2006 15:36:14 UTC