- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 21:55:46 +0100
- To: "Grosso, Paul" <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Cc: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Grosso, Paul writes:
> But, Henry, what do we have to do about the changes we made
> between the PR and the REC version? Don't we have to document
> them somewhere, or at least say that the REC text reflects
> editorial changes made due to PR feedback?
Yes -- that will be in the Director's Decision email.
> Or is this just handled by your (HST) private assurances to
> the director--as you present him with your draft of his
> director's decision--that all PR-to-REC modifications are
> appropriate?
Yes -- indeed Philippe has already given those assurances in his
request to the Steve Bratt.
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEynnSkjnJixAXWBoRAhMQAJ9diD0FsoaYXLu1plMjwY85DPMNvQCdE0em
5syqq2jNvLHt6XQlEnRWjGA=
=IAmG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 28 July 2006 20:56:00 UTC