- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 16:31:49 +0100
- To: public-xml-core-wg <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
My feeling is that the use of RFC2119 'should' here is intended to
cover cases where there _is_ no user, or there is no way for a user to
'request' traversal. In other words, a conformant implementation
which _can_ allow a user to make such a request, _must_ implement
'onRequest' as specified. Treating 'onRequest' as 'onLoad' is not an
obviously helpful fallback in the absence of a user, but you may have
a good reason for doing so.
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEx4rlkjnJixAXWBoRArlhAJ0fwszENtLC/4+fpoQXTRzlLibDNgCfXcDl
X5Pmmym2zxws2dqLsZcBUJE=
=2LK8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 26 July 2006 15:31:57 UTC