RFC2119 usage in XML 11 (was Re: Agenda for XML Core WG telcon of 2006 February 22)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Grosso, Paul writes:

> 4. XML errata.  The published 1.0 errata document is [8], the
>    published 1.1 errata document is [9], and the new (public)
>    Potential Errata (PE) document is [7]. 
>
> JohnC did a scan for MUST/SHOULD and reported [1]
> John thought most of the mays were not official mays.
>
> This is now PE 148.
>
> ACTION to Henry [due Feb 22]:  Review the MAYs again and 
> create a marked up version with changes.

Done -- see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2006/02/xml11-20060222.xml

This shows all the changes John suggested in his message [1].

Note I have used chg markup, rendered as green background, for RFC2119
MAY which John recommends should _remain_ as RFC2119 MAY, since these
are the more unusual cases.

ht

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2005Oct/0015
[7] http://www.w3.org/XML/2004/02/proposed-xml10-3e-and-xml11-errata.html
[8] http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V10-3e-errata
[9] http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V11-1e-errata
- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFD/Hw+kjnJixAXWBoRArfPAJ9cUXCCwf/AN9FBnyXDT51BbPHkZgCffdhv
CBnzpE8e2zHUSgVlFC3QjQI=
=bMeZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Wednesday, 22 February 2006 14:59:38 UTC