- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 10:22:42 +0000
- To: "Grosso, Paul" <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Cc: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Grosso, Paul writes:
> Philosophically, I think that XLink "connects" different
> points in web space in some fashion. How those points are
> determined isn't XLink's business. XLink should just point
> to XPointer and/or URI RFC's for that. XLink should let
> those specs say what to do about bad URIs.
That's what Bjoern wants and what I was trying to say -- that is,
XLink shouldn't suppress any errors raised by the things it connects.
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFD6HTykjnJixAXWBoRAh2sAJ4k5WACC6oAZT+t/+ZfnWDOBxLO6wCfRw+z
K1TKeFZlwwAlv8Q5ERLBu9s=
=dqIk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2006 10:22:52 UTC