Re: Minutes for XML Core WG telcon of 2005 Oct 12

[...]
| 26. XLink 1.1 WD: Optional type attribute 
| ----------------------------------------
| Editorial, we agree, Norm will fix.
|
|> ACTION to Norm:  Reply as feasible and bring issues worth
|> discussing to the WG via email.

This continues, I suppose, until we're done :-)

|> XLink 1.1: XML Base confusion
|> -----------------------------
|> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2
|> 005JulSep/
|> 0009
|> 
|> XML Base references RFC 2396 and XLink references RFC 3987
|> (the IRI one) which references RFC 3986 (2396-bis) for
|> absolutization and such, but nothing has changed between
|> 2396 and 3986 wrt absolutization.  So we don't see the problem.
|> 
|> ACTION to Norm:  Take this back to the commentor.

I chose to defer this one, pending our discussion of Chris Lilley's
comment on substantially the same issue.

|> XLink 1.1: Error handling
|> -------------------------
|> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2
|> 005JulSep/
|> 0013
|> 
|> We say what the conformance criteria are but not what
|> to do when an error is encountered.  For example, what
|> should we do if someone specifies an invalid value for
|> one of the xlink:* attributes.
|> 
|> Francois points out that this hasn't changed since XLink 1.0.
|> 
|> ACTION to Norm:  Craft some words along the lines of error
|> handling being implementation dependent.

Completed:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2005OctDec/0023.html

|> XLink 1.1: XLink 1.1 in XML 1.1
|> -------------------------------
|> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2
|> 005JulSep/
|> 0012
|> 
|> Norm suggests we just say that XLink works for both XML 1.0
|> and XML 1.1, and the names should just match the version
|> being used.

I've informed the commenter of this:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2005OctDec/0024.html

|> XLink 1.1: Integration with CSS
|> -------------------------------
|> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2
|> 005JulSep/
|> 0018
|> 
|> How does XLink interact with CSS's :link selector?
|> 
|> Francois suggests that we add a note that says "languages
|> such as CSS should see XLink links as links."
|> 
|> ACTION to Norm:  Respond to the commenter and to the CSS WG.

Completed:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2005OctDec/0025.html

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc.
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.