- From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 15:33:06 -0400
- To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
> From: public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org On Behalf Of Paul Grosso > Sent: Wednesday, 25 May, 2005 10:50 > To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > Subject: Minutes for XML Core WG telcon of 2005 May 25 > > The XML Core WG reviewed the QA Framework Last Call and had > > some issues: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005Jan/0025 > > The QA WG response at > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005May/0041 > > left many of us unsatisfied. See > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2005May/0004 > > summarizing things and giving other pointers. > > See also the thread starting at > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2005May/0042 > > Paul sent "holding" email in response to the QA response at: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2005May/0054 > > and Karl answered at > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2005May/0055 > > Paul remains confused and concerned; if he is the only > > one, we'll let this drop, but since others seemed to have > > concerns in the past, we'll try to find out one more time. > > We discussed this once more. Other WG members shared > some of Paul's concerns/confusion, but we decided not > to make a WG statement. > > ACTION to Paul: Post an individual reply to www-qa > and point the XML Core WG to that reply in case anyone > else cares to say anything further. I just posted my "Objection to resolution of LC comment" at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005May/0112 paul
Received on Wednesday, 25 May 2005 19:33:29 UTC