- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 13:42:53 +0200
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org, public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
On Sunday, May 8, 2005, 5:10:19 PM, Bjoern wrote: (comments about tests snipped, will reply separately) BH> * Chris Lilley wrote: >>No, it wouldn't. So, please add specific language to CSS 2.1 to state >>explicitly that xml:id is treated as ID for the purpose of the # >>selector. BH> Could you propose text that should be added? If an implementation supports CSS 2.1 and also supports xml:id, then the xml:id attribute must be treated as an ID for the purposes of CSS selector processing. BH> There seem to be lots of BH> cross-technology and error handling issues here as xml:id does not BH> define its integration into deployed architecture, It seems pretty well defined to me, what are you referring to here? BH> defining this for CSS such that xml:id processing is consistent BH> everywhere seems a bit challenging. Requiring all xml:id implementations that also do CSS to treat xml:id as an ID does not seem like rocket science to me. It seems like a ten minute fix. BH> I guess you want similar statements regarding xml:lang BH> aswell? That would depend on what you mean for xml:id. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead
Received on Monday, 9 May 2005 11:43:10 UTC