- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 13:34:52 +0200
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, www-style@w3.org, public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
On Sunday, May 8, 2005, 8:30:41 PM, Ian wrote: IH> In fact, the entire concept of "requiring xml:id support in CSS" is IH> meaningless to me. UAs will support a technology or not, there's no point IH> in a technology saying you must also support another technology, unless IH> that technology is a pre-requisite for implementing the former. IH> xml:id is completely tangential to CSS. Not really. CSS can a) require xml:id support b) requires that if CSS is supported AND xml:id is supported THEN xml:id be treated as ID for the purpose of selectors c) forbid xml:id support d) leave it wooly and ambiguous -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead
Received on Monday, 9 May 2005 11:35:33 UTC