- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 15:47:58 -0500
- To: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
- Cc: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
Belated apologies. Paul Grosso scripsit: > In the infoset, we do expose the base URI as a property, and > if we were to switch xml:base and XML itself from 2396 to > 3986, the value of the base URI property would be different. > Richard isn't sure we want to do that. I think that we should not to do that. > Should we change [base URI] to [base IRI]? There are > issues to decide here. We will hold off on doing anything > here for now. Still less should we do this. At most, we might want to add a separate [base IRI] property, but I see no point; it contains very little information not in the base URI. -- John Cowan www.reutershealth.com www.ccil.org/~cowan jcowan@reutershealth.com Arise, you prisoners of Windows / Arise, you slaves of Redmond, Wash, The day and hour soon are coming / When all the IT folks say "Gosh!" It isn't from a clever lawsuit / That Windowsland will finally fall, But thousands writing open source code / Like mice who nibble through a wall. --The Linux-nationale by Greg Baker
Received on Wednesday, 9 March 2005 20:48:31 UTC