- From: Sandra Martinez <sandra.martinez@nist.gov>
- Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:56:34 -0500
- To: "Paul Grosso" <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
- Cc: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
Regrets. Sandra At 10:51 AM 2/14/2005, Paul Grosso wrote: >We have an XML Core WG phone call scheduled for Wednesday, >February 16, from > 08:00-09:00 Pacific time aka > 11:00-12:00 Eastern time aka > 16:00-17:00 UTC > 16:00-17:00 in Ireland and the UK > 17:00-18:00 in middle (most of) Europe >on the Zakim W3C Bridge, +1 617 761 6200, passcode 9652#. >We also use IRC channel #xmlcore on irc.w3.org:6665 . > >See the XML Core group page [1] for pointers to current documents >and other information. If you have additions to the agenda, please >email them to the WG list before the start of the telcon. > >Please also review our group page's task list [2] for accuracy and >completeness and be prepared to amend if necessary and accept it >at the beginning of the call. > >Agenda >====== >1. Accepting the minutes from the last telcon [3] and > the current task status [2] (have any questions, comments, > or corrections ready by the beginning of the call). > > >2. Miscellaneous administrivia. > >The next W3C Technical Plenary Week will be 28 February 2005 >through 4 March 2005: > http://www.w3.org/2002/09/TPOverview.html > http://www.w3.org/2004/12/allgroupoverview.html > >The XML Core WG f2f meeting days will be Thursday and Friday, >March 3rd and 4th. Wednesday is the Plenary day to which all >XML Core WG members are invited. > >Register for the meeting at: >http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35125/TP2005/ > >Register at the hotel: >http://www.w3.org/2004/12/allgroupoverview.html#Venue. >The negotiated room rate at the meeting hotel, Hyatt Harborside, >http://harborside.hyatt.com/property/index.jhtml is $139 (plus >12.45% tax); this discount rate expires 5 February 2005. > >We have a tentative meeting time with the TAG on Thursday >has been RESCHEDULED to the end of Thursday morning. We >might find ourselves discussing "XML 2.0". > > >3. XLink update. > >Our WG Note "Extending XLink 1.0" has been published: >http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/NOTE-xlink10-ext-20050127/ > >W3C staff have been asked to start drafting an XML Core WG >charter modification that would (if approved by the AC) >allow us to work on XLink 1.0. Said charter mod will also >probably hand us maintenance of the C14N spec(s?). > > >4. XML errata. The published 1.0 errata document is [8], the > published 1.1 errata document is [9], and the NEW PUBLIC > Potential Errata (PE) document is [7]. > > >5. Namespaces in XML. > > Ongoing ACTION to Richard: Produce a draft for NS1.0 2nd Ed. > >Paul checked with W3C folks about whether we can >fold editorial errata from 1.1 back into 1.0 2nd Ed >and our plan is acceptable: >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2004Nov/0041 > >Richard pointed out a namespace comment at >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-names-editor/2004Dec/0000 >which requests something which is almost a different kind of schema. > >ACTION to Richard: Send email outlining the issue and your suggested >resolution. > > >6. Xinclude Rec was published 2004 December 30 at: > http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xinclude-20041220/ > >It has been brought to my attention that we apparently failed >to look at the public XInclude comments list for comments >received during the PR review which is basically the October >archives for this list: >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-xinclude-comments/2004Oct/ >We will treat these are errata. > >DV volunteers to be editor of the XInclude errata process. > >ACTION to DV: Create a PE document for XInclude. > > >7. xml:id. > >The CR was published (2005 Feb 8) at >http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/CR-xml-id-20050208/ > >The (public) xml:id LC issues is at: >http://www.w3.org/XML/2004/xml-id/lc-status/status-report.html >The LC DoC is at: >http://www.w3.org/XML/2005/01/xml-id-lc-doc.html >Our implementation report is at >http://www.w3.org/XML/2005/01/xml-id-implementation.html >We have a test suite cover page at >http://www.w3.org/XML/Test/xml-id/ > >The issue of xml:id vrs C14N and the definition of >namespaces is ongoing, originally in the xml:id >comments list and now on the www-tag list. It seems >likely that the TAG will pick up some issue out of this. > >I'm not sure how or if this should affect our CR period, >but for now, I'm assuming it doesn't. > > >8. Associating stylesheets > We have had several requests to issue some clarifications > on use of fragment identifiers in URIs to referenced > stylesheets: >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2005Feb/0022 >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2005Feb/0030 > > >9. absolutivity of [base URI] > Norm has asked a question about the absolutivity of [base URI]: >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2005Feb/0031 > > >10. XML 1.1 and C1 control characters > Norm has raised a question about the need to escape C1 control > characters in XML 1.1 (which is backward incompatible with XML 1.0): >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2005Feb/0033 > > >paul > >[1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core >[2] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#tasks >[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2005Feb/0020 >[7] >http://www.w3.org/XML/2004/02/proposed-xml10-3e-and-xml11-errata.html >[8] http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V10-3e-errata >[9] http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V11-1e-errata Sandra I. Martinez National Institute of Standards and Technology 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8970, Gaithersburg, Md. 20899 (301) 975-3579 sandra.martinez@nist.gov
Received on Wednesday, 16 February 2005 15:56:48 UTC