- From: Anne van Kesteren <fora@annevankesteren.nl>
- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 11:49:41 +0200
- To: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
- CC: Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>, Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>, www-style@w3.org, public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
Robin Berjon wrote: >> I think it is better to keep the language abstract, because there are >> no XML formats that allow xml:id yet, let alone formats that are >> supported by CSS UAs, so we won't be able to test such a statement. >> And that would keep CSS 2.1 from exiting CR. > > SVG Mobile 1.2 explicitly requires xml:id support. This means that SVG > 1.2 UAs will support CSS styling of documents containing xml:id. I don't > know if Batik already supports xml:id but I wouldn't be surprised if it > did. There's also been discussion about this in Mozilla and it looked > like xml:id would be going in. So do those UAs implement all of CSS2.1? As you should compare the specification as a whole, not just feature for feature between two specifications who happen to have that feature interoparably implemented. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/>
Received on Thursday, 28 April 2005 09:49:51 UTC