- From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 11:42:45 +0200
- To: Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>
- Cc: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>, www-style@w3.org, public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
Bert Bos wrote: >>Specifically, would it make sense for the CSS specification >>to state explicitly that attributes named xml:id will be >>treated as IDs when styling XML documents? > > I think it is better to keep the language abstract, because there are > no XML formats that allow xml:id yet, let alone formats that are > supported by CSS UAs, so we won't be able to test such a statement. > And that would keep CSS 2.1 from exiting CR. SVG Mobile 1.2 explicitly requires xml:id support. This means that SVG 1.2 UAs will support CSS styling of documents containing xml:id. I don't know if Batik already supports xml:id but I wouldn't be surprised if it did. There's also been discussion about this in Mozilla and it looked like xml:id would be going in. -- Robin Berjon Research Scientist Expway, http://expway.com/
Received on Thursday, 28 April 2005 09:42:59 UTC