- From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 11:36:04 -0400
- To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
Not to put undue pressure on those who kindly volunteer so often, but our agenda is getting so long that I thought I'd send out this auxiliary email with "near term" actions. (I've omitted long term actions or actions for those who are on holidays.) See the agenda for more context for each action. (If you reply to this message, please be sure to adjust the subject appropriately for the topic at hand.) ACTION to Richard: Augment your earlier XPath 2.0/XQuery 1.0 Data Model review with respect to the issue about what the types are in the data model and send them in as XML Core WG comments. ACTION to Richard: Reply to Sandra's question about the XML Test Suite: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2005Mar/0037 ACTION to Norm: Suggest actual wording for PEX1--fatal XInclude errors in unactivated fallbacks ACTION to Norm: Reply to the commentor for PEX2--URI or IRI errors handling. ACTION to Francois: Provide a suggestion for PEX5--XML encoding detection in parse="text" (esp. wrt. *+xml and charsets). ACTION to Norm: Investigate what should happen on the last xml:id test. ACTION to Richard: Suggest some rewording for what we say about xml:id errors and pass it by ERH. ACTION to Henry: Raise the Associating stylesheets issue at the TAG level. ACTION to Richard: Draft a message for Roy et al. regarding base URI versus 2396 and 3986 and same-document references and send to the XML Core WG for discussion (later, to be sent to the uri group and the tag).
Received on Monday, 18 April 2005 15:36:36 UTC