- From: Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler) <RogerCutler@chevrontexaco.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 09:00:16 -0600
- To: "Kuo Kan Liang" <kkliang@ntu.edu.tw>, Silvia.De.Castro.Garcia@esa.int
- cc: public-xml-binary@w3.org
- Message-ID: <71C38086EA230D43941DD0A3BAFF8CA9059139@bocnte2k3.hou150.chevrontexaco.net>
I think that there are a number of use cases where chunking is not going to help. Sending location and map data to mobile phones is probably one. The issue is how many bits, not how many pieces they come in. The floating point data usage case from the energy industry (which I contributed) is definitely not going to be helped by chunking. That would only make things worse -- it would not address the primary issues whatsoever. I don't know what subclass of usage cases chunking would address, but my impression is that it is fairly limited. -----Original Message----- From: public-xml-binary-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xml-binary-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Kuo Kan Liang Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 8:12 AM To: Silvia.De.Castro.Garcia@esa.int Cc: public-xml-binary@w3.org Subject: Re: question: Increasing factor for XML vs Binary Hi, Following is a private message to me from a kind person. Maybe I should wait for him to write this, but I wish to share what he told me to you. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- Why is XML unnatural here? I can see that the XML documents could become very large, but a binary XML representation is only likely to win you an improvement of 10-30, and that only sounds like a short reprieve to me. You have have to end up chunking the data somehow, and once you do that, the chunked XML could be quite manageable. [Some text deleted] Cheers, Tony. -- Anthony B. Coates London Market Systems Limited 33 Throgmorton Street, London, EC2N 2BR http://www.londonmarketsystems.com/ mailto:abcoates@londonmarketsystems.com Mobile/Cell: +44 (79) 0543 9026 [MDDL Editor (Market Data Definition Language), http://www.mddl.org/] [FpML Arch WG Member (Financial Products Markup Language), http://www.fpml.org/] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Silvia.De.Castro.Garcia@esa.int wrote: Hi all, I would like to know the estimation order of the increasing factor for the XML format respect to the equivalent binary product, I mean, which is the order of the overload that will supose using XML instead of binary format? Thank you very much, Best regards, Silvia de Castro.
Received on Thursday, 4 November 2004 15:01:16 UTC