- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 11:31:17 -0500
- To: XHTML WG <public-xhtml2@w3.org>
More on itsRules term: -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: ISSUE-24: Proposal for dealing with case-insensitive terms in the XHTML vocabulary Resent-Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 16:27:38 +0000 Resent-From: public-rdfa-wg@w3.org Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 18:27:04 +0200 From: Felix Sasaki <felix.sasaki@fh-potsdam.de> To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com> CC: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>, RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org> 2010/7/14 Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com <mailto:shane@aptest.com>> Holy crap - I missed that one! That's a significant problem. I need to look into where that came from At http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/RelExtensions this is actually called i18nrules, with the same meaning: rules in terms of the "Internationalization Tag Set", see http://www.w3.org/TR/its/#selection-global . Having i18nrules instead of itsRules would be fine as well IMO. Felix and if we can fix it. On 7/14/2010 10:55 AM, Toby Inkster wrote: On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 09:33:18 -0500 Shane McCarron<shane@aptest.com <mailto:shane@aptest.com>> wrote: I agree that rel=":Next" refers to a CURIE, not a term. As such, the special processing rules I proposed to not apply. However, I looked at the terms defined in http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab/ and, at least for now, none of these terms are mixed case. "itsRules" is mixed-case. -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com <mailto:shane@aptest.com>
Received on Wednesday, 14 July 2010 16:31:51 UTC