- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 11:31:17 -0500
- To: XHTML WG <public-xhtml2@w3.org>
More on itsRules term:
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: ISSUE-24: Proposal for dealing with case-insensitive terms
in the XHTML vocabulary
Resent-Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 16:27:38 +0000
Resent-From: public-rdfa-wg@w3.org
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 18:27:04 +0200
From: Felix Sasaki <felix.sasaki@fh-potsdam.de>
To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
CC: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>, RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
2010/7/14 Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com <mailto:shane@aptest.com>>
Holy crap - I missed that one! That's a significant problem. I
need to look into where that came from
At http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/RelExtensions this is actually called
i18nrules, with the same meaning: rules in terms of the
"Internationalization Tag Set", see
http://www.w3.org/TR/its/#selection-global . Having i18nrules instead of
itsRules would be fine as well IMO.
Felix
and if we can fix it.
On 7/14/2010 10:55 AM, Toby Inkster wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 09:33:18 -0500
Shane McCarron<shane@aptest.com <mailto:shane@aptest.com>> wrote:
I agree that rel=":Next" refers to a CURIE, not a term. As
such, the
special processing rules I proposed to not apply. However,
I looked
at the terms defined in http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab/
and, at
least for now, none of these terms are mixed case.
"itsRules" is mixed-case.
--
Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
<mailto:shane@aptest.com>
Received on Wednesday, 14 July 2010 16:31:51 UTC