public-xhtml2@w3.org from March 2009: by thread

[XHTML] Agenda 2009-04-01 Roland Merrick (Tuesday, 31 March)

Re: [Fwd: Re: Integrating ITS into XHTML2] Felix Sasaki (Friday, 27 March)

New Scribe Agent: CommonScribe Steven Pemberton (Friday, 27 March)

list in a P examples [XHTML2 WG ACTION-65] Gregory J. Rosmaita (Thursday, 26 March)

Re: list in a P examples [XHTML2 WG ACTION-65] Gregory J. Rosmaita (Thursday, 26 March)

[XHTML] minutes: virtual face2face, part 2, 2009-03-26 Gregory J. Rosmaita (Thursday, 26 March)

Integrating ITS into XHTML2 Steven Pemberton (Thursday, 26 March)

RE: Integrating ITS into XHTML2 Yves Savourel (Thursday, 26 March)

[ACTION-64] Changes to CURIE spec to address prefix support Shane McCarron (Wednesday, 25 March)

Re: [ACTION-64] Changes to CURIE spec to address prefix support Roland Merrick (Wednesday, 25 March)

[XHTML] Virtual f2f Day 2 - 2009-03-26 Roland Merrick (Wednesday, 25 March)

[XHTML] Agenda 2009-03-25 Roland Merrick (Wednesday, 25 March)

Will not make it 18-03-2009 Tina Holmboe (Wednesday, 18 March)

[XHTML] Agenda 2009-03-18 Roland Merrick (Wednesday, 18 March)

Re: [XHTML] Agenda 2009-03-18 Alessio Cartocci (Wednesday, 18 March)

Edit Attributes module question Shane McCarron (Tuesday, 17 March)

Re: Edit Attributes module question Steven Pemberton (Wednesday, 18 March)

[ACTION-61] CURIE script posted to wiki Shane McCarron (Tuesday, 17 March)

Status XHTML2 WG Steven Pemberton (Friday, 13 March)

Fwd: Re: Transition request for 4 PERs: XHTML 1.0, XHTML 1.1, XHTML basic 1.1, XHTML Print Steven Pemberton (Thursday, 12 March)

Reminder: XHTML 2 Virtual f2f - day 2 - 2009-03-26 (Thursday) Roland Merrick (Wednesday, 11 March)

CR Transition Request for XHTML Role Attribute Module Steven Pemberton (Wednesday, 11 March)

[ACTION-47] Re: [XHTMLAccess] i18n comment 2: Keycode or character Steven Pemberton (Wednesday, 11 March)

RE: [ACTION-47] Re: [XHTMLAccess] i18n comment 2: Keycode or character Phillips, Addison (Wednesday, 11 March)
- Re: [ACTION-47] Re: [XHTMLAccess] i18n comment 2: Keycode or character Steven Pemberton (Wednesday, 11 March)

CURIES and XML Host languages (PR#8058) bparsia@cs.manchester.ac.uk (Wednesday, 11 March)

[XHTML] Agenda 2009-03-11 Roland Merrick (Wednesday, 11 March)

XHTML2, RDFa, and MetaData Shane McCarron (Tuesday, 10 March)

[XHTML] minutes: virtual f2f, 2009-03-10 [draft] Gregory J. Rosmaita (Tuesday, 10 March)

Re: [XHTML] minutes: virtual f2f, 2009-03-10 [draft] Alessio Cartocci (Wednesday, 11 March)
- Re: [XHTML] minutes: virtual f2f, 2009-03-10 [draft] Steven Pemberton (Wednesday, 11 March)

Reminder: XHTML 2 Virtual f2f - 2009-03-12 (Tuesday) Roland Merrick (Thursday, 5 March)

some additional items for upcoming virtual F2Fs Markus Gylling (Thursday, 5 March)

XHTML2+XForms attribute clashes [was: RNG Schemas for XForms] Markus Gylling (Thursday, 5 March)

US Government Website uses XForms, XHTML, RDFa Steven Pemberton (Thursday, 5 March)

Re: US Government Website uses XForms, XHTML, RDFa Steven Pemberton (Monday, 9 March)

Will not make it Wed 4th of March 2009 Tina Holmboe (Wednesday, 4 March)

[XHTML] Agenda 2009-03-04 Roland Merrick (Wednesday, 4 March)

Re: [XHTML] Agenda 2009-03-04 Steven Pemberton (Wednesday, 4 March)
Re: [XHTML] Agenda 2009-03-04 Alessio Cartocci (Wednesday, 4 March)
Re: [XHTML] Agenda 2009-03-04 Mark Birbeck (Wednesday, 4 March)

Fwd: Re: Transition Announcement: WAI-ARIA Last Call and WAI-ARIA User Agent Implementation Guide FPWD Steven Pemberton (Tuesday, 3 March)

Fwd: US clocks move to Summer Time Sunday, 8 March Steven Pemberton (Monday, 2 March)

Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] Steven Pemberton (Monday, 2 March)

Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] Julian Reschke (Monday, 2 March)
- Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] Ben Adida (Wednesday, 4 March)
  - Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] Julian Reschke (Thursday, 5 March)
    - Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] Steven Pemberton (Thursday, 5 March)

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Henri Sivonen (Sunday, 1 March)

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Karl Dubost (Sunday, 1 March)
- Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Michael Hausenblas (Sunday, 1 March)
  - Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Karl Dubost (Sunday, 1 March)
  - Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Rob Sayre (Friday, 6 March)
    - Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Sam Ruby (Friday, 6 March)
      - Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel John Kemp (Friday, 6 March)
      - RE: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Chris Wilson (Friday, 6 March)
        
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Sam Ruby (Saturday, 7 March)
        
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Jonas Sicking (Saturday, 7 March)
      - Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Rob Sayre (Tuesday, 10 March)
        
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Sam Ruby (Wednesday, 11 March)
        
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Rob Sayre (Wednesday, 11 March)
- Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Sam Ruby (Sunday, 1 March)
  - Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Dan Brickley (Sunday, 1 March)
    - Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Karl Dubost (Sunday, 1 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida (Sunday, 1 March)
- Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Rob Sayre (Sunday, 1 March)
- Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Philip Taylor (Sunday, 1 March)
- Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Henri Sivonen (Monday, 2 March)
  - Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida (Thursday, 5 March)
    - Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Maciej Stachowiak (Thursday, 5 March)
      - Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida (Thursday, 5 March)
        
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Henri Sivonen (Thursday, 5 March)
  - Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Tim Berners-Lee (Friday, 6 March)
    - Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Maciej Stachowiak (Friday, 6 March)
    - Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Henri Sivonen (Friday, 6 March)
      - Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Simon Pieters (Monday, 9 March)

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Mark Nottingham (Sunday, 1 March)

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida (Sunday, 1 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Sam Ruby (Sunday, 1 March)
- Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Mark Nottingham (Sunday, 1 March)
  - Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Sam Ruby (Sunday, 1 March)
    - Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Mark Nottingham (Sunday, 1 March)
    - Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Rob Sayre (Sunday, 1 March)
      - Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Dan Brickley (Sunday, 1 March)
        
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Rob Sayre (Sunday, 1 March)
        
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke (Sunday, 1 March)
        
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Dan Brickley (Sunday, 1 March)
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Rob Sayre (Sunday, 1 March)
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Dan Brickley (Sunday, 1 March)
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Rob Sayre (Sunday, 1 March)
      - Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke (Sunday, 1 March)
  - Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida (Sunday, 1 March)
    - Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke (Sunday, 1 March)
      - Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida (Sunday, 1 March)
        
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke (Sunday, 1 March)
        
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida (Sunday, 1 March)
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Maciej Stachowiak (Sunday, 1 March)
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida (Wednesday, 4 March)
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 4 March)
        
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke (Thursday, 5 March)
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Manu Sporny (Thursday, 5 March)
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke (Thursday, 5 March)
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Steven Pemberton (Thursday, 5 March)
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke (Thursday, 5 March)
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Steven Pemberton (Thursday, 5 March)
        
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Leif Halvard Silli (Friday, 6 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Leif Halvard Silli (Sunday, 1 March)

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 March 2009 09:34:50 UTC