public-xhtml2@w3.org from March 2009 by author

Alessio Cartocci

Re: [XHTML] Agenda 2009-03-18 (Wednesday, 18 March)
Re: [XHTML] minutes: virtual f2f, 2009-03-10 [draft] (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: [XHTML] Agenda 2009-03-04 (Wednesday, 4 March)

Ben Adida

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] (Wednesday, 4 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Wednesday, 4 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)

bparsia@cs.manchester.ac.uk

CURIES and XML Host languages (PR#8058) (Wednesday, 11 March)

Chris Wilson

RE: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 6 March)

Dan Brickley

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)

Felix Sasaki

Re: [Fwd: Re: Integrating ITS into XHTML2] (Friday, 27 March)

Gregory J. Rosmaita

Re: list in a P examples [XHTML2 WG ACTION-65] (Thursday, 26 March)
list in a P examples [XHTML2 WG ACTION-65] (Thursday, 26 March)
[XHTML] minutes: virtual face2face, part 2, 2009-03-26 (Thursday, 26 March)
[XHTML] minutes: virtual f2f, 2009-03-10 [draft] (Tuesday, 10 March)

Henri Sivonen

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 6 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Monday, 2 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)

John Kemp

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 6 March)

Jonas Sicking

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 7 March)

Julian Reschke

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] (Monday, 2 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)

Karl Dubost

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)

Leif Halvard Silli

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 6 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)

Maciej Stachowiak

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 6 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)

Manu Sporny

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Thursday, 5 March)

Mark Birbeck

Re: [XHTML] Agenda 2009-03-04 (Wednesday, 4 March)

Mark Nottingham

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Wednesday, 4 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)

Markus Gylling

some additional items for upcoming virtual F2Fs (Thursday, 5 March)
XHTML2+XForms attribute clashes [was: RNG Schemas for XForms] (Thursday, 5 March)

Michael Hausenblas

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)

Philip Taylor

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)

Phillips, Addison

RE: [ACTION-47] Re: [XHTMLAccess] i18n comment 2: Keycode or character (Wednesday, 11 March)

Rob Sayre

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Tuesday, 10 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 6 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)

Roland Merrick

[XHTML] Agenda 2009-04-01 (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [ACTION-64] Changes to CURIE spec to address prefix support (Wednesday, 25 March)
[XHTML] Virtual f2f Day 2 - 2009-03-26 (Wednesday, 25 March)
[XHTML] Agenda 2009-03-25 (Wednesday, 25 March)
[XHTML] Agenda 2009-03-18 (Wednesday, 18 March)
Reminder: XHTML 2 Virtual f2f - day 2 - 2009-03-26 (Thursday) (Wednesday, 11 March)
[XHTML] Agenda 2009-03-11 (Wednesday, 11 March)
Reminder: XHTML 2 Virtual f2f - 2009-03-12 (Tuesday) (Thursday, 5 March)
[XHTML] Agenda 2009-03-04 (Wednesday, 4 March)

Sam Ruby

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 7 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 6 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)

Shane McCarron

[ACTION-64] Changes to CURIE spec to address prefix support (Wednesday, 25 March)
Edit Attributes module question (Tuesday, 17 March)
[ACTION-61] CURIE script posted to wiki (Tuesday, 17 March)
XHTML2, RDFa, and MetaData (Tuesday, 10 March)

Simon Pieters

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Monday, 9 March)

Steven Pemberton

New Scribe Agent: CommonScribe (Friday, 27 March)
Integrating ITS into XHTML2 (Thursday, 26 March)
Re: Edit Attributes module question (Wednesday, 18 March)
Status XHTML2 WG (Friday, 13 March)
Fwd: Re: Transition request for 4 PERs: XHTML 1.0, XHTML 1.1, XHTML basic 1.1, XHTML Print (Thursday, 12 March)
Re: [ACTION-47] Re: [XHTMLAccess] i18n comment 2: Keycode or character (Wednesday, 11 March)
CR Transition Request for XHTML Role Attribute Module (Wednesday, 11 March)
[ACTION-47] Re: [XHTMLAccess] i18n comment 2: Keycode or character (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: [XHTML] minutes: virtual f2f, 2009-03-10 [draft] (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: US Government Website uses XForms, XHTML, RDFa (Monday, 9 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] (Thursday, 5 March)
US Government Website uses XForms, XHTML, RDFa (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [XHTML] Agenda 2009-03-04 (Wednesday, 4 March)
Fwd: Re: Transition Announcement: WAI-ARIA Last Call and WAI-ARIA User Agent Implementation Guide FPWD (Tuesday, 3 March)
Fwd: US clocks move to Summer Time Sunday, 8 March (Monday, 2 March)
Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] (Monday, 2 March)

Tim Berners-Lee

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 6 March)

Tina Holmboe

Will not make it 18-03-2009 (Wednesday, 18 March)
Will not make it Wed 4th of March 2009 (Wednesday, 4 March)

Yves Savourel

RE: Integrating ITS into XHTML2 (Thursday, 26 March)

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 March 2009 09:34:50 UTC