W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xhtml2@w3.org > February 2009

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 10:53:19 -0800
Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, public-xhtml2@w3.org, "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>
Message-id: <F775BBBE-3165-429E-8AFA-D6A639659674@apple.com>
To: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>

On Feb 28, 2009, at 8:34 AM, Ben Adida wrote:

> Julian Reschke wrote:
>>> Our
>>> work began before the HTML5 group had anything to do with W3C. So I
>>> don't think we did anything rogue or unilateral.
>> I think what matters more is the end date, not the start date.
> No. The RDFa task force was chartered for XHTML work, and that work  
> was
> specifically in a different working group than HTML5's work. The end
> date of the HTML WG is December 2010, and that's not counting comments
> by Ian that the WG will keep going until 2022. I strongly disagree  
> with
> the idea that other work should stop in the meantime, especially  
> when it
> belongs to a different charter.

It seems inconsistent to me to say on the one hand that the RDFa Task  
Force doesn't have to coordinate with the HTML WG because its work is  
XHTML-specific, but then on the other hand that the RDFa Task Force's  
work product can be applied to the text/html serialization of HTML. It  
seems to me you have taken both positions on this thread.

Received on Saturday, 28 February 2009 18:54:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:40:04 UTC